The car: They found out only a single partial print which turned out to be J's. We have to assume the car was thoroughly wiped down. I have already said this but there would be no need to wipe down anything in the back seat unless J. or her abductor(s) had been there. If Rob and J's fingerprints were in the car or on the DVD that would be expected.
It seems very professional. It remains weird how could you be sure a single hair did not fall? They could have burned the car anything. I don't see how those who are persuaded by the supposed crime scene evidence on the hood of the car can mesh that carelessness because that is what it would be with the job inside. There IS the shoe or boot print. That seems real enough no?
I think the evidence points to work and am equally persuaded by a theory J. was trafficked as I am by that she was killed. I need to look back at those posts about her company and those on the B. site I hadn't really understood who this J.C. was I had imagined a much gentler person who had just made a 'sicko' joke about J. being eaten.
If trafficked I am thinking it would be combination of hatred/jealousy and financial ambition. The trouble is the crime occuring right after the trip fits with Websleuther F's idea that there was pent up jealousy after the trip AND a theory that J. was set up in some way. Probably not by professionals per se but my someone who had a few dodgy connections.
It is possible that there is a connection between at least two of: J's old romantic partner - a worker or two not THE WORKERS that would be impossible to keep under wraps - someone at work - traffickers - someone else - those may not be separate suspects.
It seems very professional. It remains weird how could you be sure a single hair did not fall? They could have burned the car anything. I don't see how those who are persuaded by the supposed crime scene evidence on the hood of the car can mesh that carelessness because that is what it would be with the job inside. There IS the shoe or boot print. That seems real enough no?
I think the evidence points to work and am equally persuaded by a theory J. was trafficked as I am by that she was killed. I need to look back at those posts about her company and those on the B. site I hadn't really understood who this J.C. was I had imagined a much gentler person who had just made a 'sicko' joke about J. being eaten.
If trafficked I am thinking it would be combination of hatred/jealousy and financial ambition. The trouble is the crime occuring right after the trip fits with Websleuther F's idea that there was pent up jealousy after the trip AND a theory that J. was set up in some way. Probably not by professionals per se but my someone who had a few dodgy connections.
It is possible that there is a connection between at least two of: J's old romantic partner - a worker or two not THE WORKERS that would be impossible to keep under wraps - someone at work - traffickers - someone else - those may not be separate suspects.
Last edited: