GUILTY FL - Jordan Davis, 17, shot to death, Satellite Beach, 23 Nov 2012 #5

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
A.D.A McCoy said:
but Scarlett! They weren't kids! One was like 20 years old! or something. And after Dunn shot at the suv, the black kids left the scene! Both parties must be guilty of something, no?

FFS! Put aside the fact that the racist, lying Michael Dunn, is the one on trial for murder, and the evidence is overwhelming, some want both sides to share responsibility. Hmm, I wonder why?
Click to expand...

JMO, Respectfully, they were kids. No, I don't believe both parties are guilty.

MD is not king of the world. He doesn't get to order other drivers around, and then start shooting them when he doesn't find them obedient enough to his demands. If he really thought there was a problem, he could have dialed 911. It's an pretty easy number to remember.
 
A.D.A McCoy said:
but Scarlett! They weren't kids! One was like 20 years old! or something. And after Dunn shot at the suv, the black kids left the scene! Both parties must be guilty of something, no?

FFS! Put aside the fact that the racist, lying Michael Dunn, is the one on trial for murder, and the evidence is overwhelming, some want both sides to share responsibility. Hmm, I wonder why?
Click to expand...

I assume you are being sarcastic. The human brain is not fully mature until age 26. So, yes they are kids. I really hope this jury will do the obvious right thing and adjudicate him GUILTY. I have zero tolerance for bigoted, abusive, racist thugs like him.
 
Steely Dan said:
BBM

Wow! He was planning to chuck nuns. How low can ya go? :banghead:
Click to expand...

OMG, you made me laugh. It's been one of those tough days today. Tomorrow is a new one, good. Thanks for the smile!
 
Zuri said:
I assume you are being sarcastic. The human brain is not fully mature until age 26. So, yes they are kids. I really hope this jury will do the obvious right thing and adjudicate him GUILTY. I have zero tolerance for bigoted, abusive, racist thugs like him.
Click to expand...

I could be wrong but I think McCoy really was being sarcastic. MD did not think they were just kids because he is such a poor judge of character, I think. MD certainly has a short fuse. He hides it well but you can see him burning inside. jmo
 
LambChop said:
I could be wrong but I think McCoy really was being sarcastic. MD did not think they were just kids because he is such a poor judge of character, I think. MD certainly has a short fuse. He hides it well but you can see him burning inside. jmo
Click to expand...

I thought so too!
 
Kensie said:
I saw a little bit of the trial on HLN yesterday.
Click to expand...

----------
Hi Kensie! I have been watching some on HLN, saw nan tonight. I think that Frank Taaffe (whatever) is driving her nuts. I also think it is the sataions idea to have him on. Talk about a racist!! he's no.1 in my book. I wonder what people would say if this were reversed. A car full of white kids and a black man shot one of them? This is all insane. I just hope the jury comes up with what they feel is the right thing to do. IMO. O/T I went out tonight!! :floorlaugh: went to Wallyworld to do some shopping. felt so good.:loveyou:
 
Zuri said:
I assume you are being sarcastic. The human brain is not fully mature until age 26. So, yes they are kids. I really hope this jury will do the obvious right thing and adjudicate him GUILTY. I have zero tolerance for bigoted, abusive, racist thugs like him.
Click to expand...

Nor do I.

Gin said:
JMO, Respectfully, they were kids. No, I don't believe both parties are guilty.

MD is not king of the world. He doesn't get to order other drivers around, and then start shooting them when he doesn't find them obedient enough to his demands. If he really thought there was a problem, he could have dialed 911. It's an pretty easy number to remember.
Click to expand...

LambChop said:
I could be wrong but I think McCoy really was being sarcastic. MD did not think they were just kids because he is such a poor judge of character, I think. MD certainly has a short fuse. He hides it well but you can see him burning inside. jmo
Click to expand...

I was. That elusive eyeroll smiley could have come in handy in that post, me thinks.
 
Lets see if Jordan shot at him there would be gun residue on his hands. And I guess he went searching for the shell casing to throw that away with the big shot gun....
 
Imo one could see where this whole Dunn investigation was going to go when arrested and brought in for questioning Dunn asked for a magazine. Really! Who does that? Another smartest man in the room done in buy his own ego. When convicted and at sentencing, imo the prosecutor will bring in a lot of Dunn's character issues. jmo

ciao
 
The margins are gone! I cant thank unless I scroll waaaaaaayyyyyy down the line.:laughcry: :loveyou:



By Jove the lines are back!!:floorlaugh:
 
nightwatch said:
Imo one could see where this whole Dunn investigation was going to go when arrested and bought in for questioning Dunn asked for a magazine. Really! Who does that? Another smartest man in the room done in buy his own ego. When convicted and at sentencing, imo the prosecutor will bring in a lot of Dunn's character issues. jmo

ciao
Click to expand...

Jodi displayed similar behavior when she was arrested, asking for them to turn the AC off, asking for a sweater, etc. I think it's demonstrative of narcissism.
 
MeeBee said:
Jodi displayed similar behavior when she was arrested, asking for them to turn the AC off, asking for a sweater, etc. I think it's demonstrative of narcissism.
Click to expand...

I'd have to agree.
 
OT I love tapatalk, but for those of us that post from our cellphones, geez at times what a challenge. It is nice to keep up with the conversations no matter where we are. Lol

ciao
 
corq said:
Completely different kind of case, but Florida did get the Bob Ward murder case right IMO. I never bought his story, but I felt like the jury could be fooled with the painting of victim in that one. Jury didn't buy it, asked a lot of questions during deliberation.

IMO, the jury here is only waivering between 1st degree and 2nd, probably regarding his intent.

I think if he had his weapon on his person *first* and somehow angrily, reactively shot at the boys, that might be 2nd degree. (If I were a juror.)

MD confronted, then reached into his glove box for the weapon and fired that many shots into an occupied vehicle. For me this raises it to 1st degree.

He made a decision to get the gun when he could have just let the whole thing go.
-----------
Corg, I hope you are right. I hope the jury realizes he could have killed four kids that night! That is nothing to sneeze at~ four lives could have been lost. I'd drive like a Bat out of he!! to get out of there too. He sneers when he sits there!!! Oh God let them find him guilty..:loveyou:
Again, I just think they are taking their time on the degree of the crime, not the guilt of shooting the victim.
Click to expand...

P S getting message my message is too short! :floorlaugh: :seeya:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 112 more.
Total: 2,285 (members: 113, guests: 2,172)

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
2,172
Total visitors
2,285
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
601,337
Messages
18,122,964
Members
231,023
Latest member
australianwebsleuth
Back
Top