Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MOOThat’s how I’m feeling. I don’t think someone would lie about a story like that, esp the bit about what the IT buddy found on the shared server. All of the players can be tracked down. I think they’re all in disbelief sharing stories now, wondering what other signs they may have missed. But I do wish what they found back then had been reported. Except his buddy was bribed to stay quiet and perhaps many were afraid of who provided the $$$ to stay zipped.
I wish I had a vomit emoji to post here. Who exactly does he think he is? " That will never happen to me because I'm smart and I avoid sketchy places" NO it wont happen to you because YOU are the sketch in those places.At times on Reddit, SS says “my wife and child” but also “stepdaughter” and also “GFs daughter”, even ex-GFs daughter. News said “life partner.” What was up with that relationship?
Here he is pontificating about how he wouldn’t hesitate to shoot someone who was attempting to kidnap his wife or child, and definitely wouldn’t sit around relying on police while hoping they aren’t “TOO MOLESTED or murdered.” UGH
View attachment 487889
(Snipped for focus)At times on Reddit, SS says “my wife and child” but also “stepdaughter” and also “GFs daughter”, even ex-GFs daughter. News said “life partner.” What was up with that relationship?
MOO
Keeping quiet about that *advertiser censored* file led to events that ultimately likely cost Maddie her life.
An IT guy should have known to report to police.
Was the GH link removed? It's just showing me an empty box in your post.Another poster provided a GH video last night. A friend of SS's calls in to tell what he knows about the monster. In the opening, he talks about SS working at Disney (Epicot Center-TRex) until sometime in September last year. So now you have me curious - did something happen?
There is also a statement from the friend regarding a digital file discovered on SS's network. Another rooomate at the time who was an IT guy, discovered some very interesting things. Supposedly there was a payoff from someone in SS's family, so the information wouldn't be reported to LE.
Is any of this true? The friend is pretty specific in what he states, but who knows? Many more details in the link below.
He appeared to use social media the way most do, projecting an image of himself he wanted people to see.(Snipped for focus)
Can’t speak towards the reality of the relationship, but on Reddit it is pretty commonplace for people to slightly alter inconsequential details to try and preserve anonymity. For example, we know he says he was a Disney employee, and that he posts about it on Reddit. It would be normal behavior on Reddit for him to say he worked on a different ride than he actually did, or that one of his stories occurred during a different time than it actually did.
I’d be cautious in taking any individual detail he give on Reddit about his life as absolute fact.
From a little research, it appears to me that the law has been on the books since at least 1982 - before SS and friends were born. The entire computer age has grown up around the law that has total zero tolerance for visual images of children related to abuse and *advertiser censored*. So, yes, if said IT guy had taken classes in the field, he should have been aware. If he had been self taught and was learning piecemeal -- still the law had been on the books for about 20 years or more. It's difficult to impossible to give him a pass on the choice he made.MOO
Keeping quiet about that *advertiser censored* file led to events that ultimately likely cost Maddie her life.
An IT guy should have known to report to police.
Definitely.It's difficult to impossible to give him a pass on the choice he made.
It’s still showing and playing for me. Both in the quote post and in her original post.Was the GH link removed? It's just showing me an empty box in your post.
Agree. @Rolypolyoly pointed out, that whoever paid for not going to police even more cuplable.From a little research, it appears to me that the law has been on the books since at least 1982 - before SS and friends were born. The entire computer age has grown up around the law that has total zero tolerance for visual images of children related to abuse and *advertiser censored*. So, yes, if said IT guy had taken classes in the field, he should have been aware. If he had been self taught and was learning piecemeal -- still the law had been on the books for about 20 years or more. It's difficult to impossible to give him a pass on the choice he made.
The reason for testing may have been a school recommendation.I’m curious what led up to the decision to get Maddie tested for autism. Usually parents seek out help when they are at their wits end. Did Maddie and her mom fight a lot? Did Maddie throw a lot of tantrums even as a preteen? There would have been some catalyst for Mom deciding it is time to begin testing. We now know Maddie was likely being abused and that was probably a huge factor into behavior issues.
Short answer: we don't know.If someone can help explain it would be much appreciated. When did MS's mom last see her?
This guy seems to love the attention that this dreadful incident has brought him. Kinda sickened me actually.Especially saying over and over that he and SS were “attached at the hip” for the better part of a decade.
Ok thanks, now I don't feel so uninformed. Do we know when her Mom left the home? What her work situation was?Short answer: we don't know.