I see that
Peggy Sue Houser is listed in NamUs as a rule-out for this UID - But
how in the "H" can this not be a match? There must be a mistake!!!
Peggy Sue Houser's Charley Page:
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/h/houser_peggy.html
DoeNet Case 424UFFL:
http://doenetwork.org/cases/424uffl.html
NamUs Case 216:
https://identifyus.org/cases/216
* Both PSH and the UID are from TAMPA.
* The UID's skeletal remains were found on January 3, 1982, (i.e., 5 1/2 months or 203 days after PSH's Date of Last Contact)
* Both PSH and the UID have identical gaps, between 7 and 8 AND between 8 and 9. IN ADDITION TO A LARGER GAP behind 7.
* Four of PSH's upper teeth, and two lower teeth never erupted. The UID has retained her primary deciduous (i.e., baby teeth) in place of her second molars (i.e., 2, 15, 18, and 31), and the two upper wisdom teeth (i.e., 1 and 16) were impacted (as were her lower wisdom teeth). The only difference here is the distinction between impacted and unerupted.
* PSH's height (5'4" to 5'5") matches spot-on to the UID.
* PSH's age (18) is within range for the UID (14 - 20)
* PSH's B&W photo overlays very cleanly to the straight-on view of the reconstruction. (except that the UID Recon's teeth aren't clenched, so the chin aligns a little lower than PSH's chin)
Somebody had to have ruled these two cases out in error.
WHAT GIVES???!!! :waitasec::waitasec::waitasec: