The '
circumstances of her disappearence' has also changed on
NamUs from 'a relative saw her being forced into a car after school', to 'She ran away from her home'. That's quite a substantial difference.
Very odd. I wonder if they deemed the relative's witness statement of February 14, 1973 unreliable.
It's also strange how the year has been changed on the NamuUs 'date of last contact' (February 14, 1971), whereas the month+day has stayed the same.
The Charley Project and
The Doe Network still say she was abducted shortly after leaving school on February 14, 1973!?