dar107
Active Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2009
- Messages
- 949
- Reaction score
- 175
The blacked out bit is too long to be a single word, so it probably isnt a relative (those would be single words). Something like "neighbour's *****" or "roommate's *****" perhaps. I think that would be reasonable since it would have to have been someone the roommates knew well enough to have suspicions but could not approach directly in the event they were wrong. It is also unlikely to be someone without an obvious connection to Jarred since any suspicious behaviour on his part would have generated a more direct response in that case.
Judging from the descriptions of the movies I doubt those were made by him, they describe unusual props which suggests that it was commercially produced. If I were to make a guess I would say they date from the 90s and were made somewhere in eastern europe/soviet union. There was a lot of commercially produced pornographic material involving illegal acts (kiddie *advertiser censored* included) generated after the fall of communism in that region at the time which is still floating around on the internet today.
That would leave the pictures. This Jarred guy doesn't seem particularly sophisticated, I doubt he was part of a child *advertiser censored* ring or anything like that, most of this material probably came from the internet as well. The most recent charges however imply that they have identified at least one of the subjects in the pictures as someone he knew, which would of course implicate him in producing them.
I'm curious about what they mean by "large amount of child erotica" though, the wording implies that it was distinct from the 29 *advertiser censored* pictures/movies.
I was thinking something like "his (insert relation) (insert name)"