Arkay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,757
- Reaction score
- 44,090
Everyone accused is presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law. That doesn't necessarily apply to internet discussion forums or social media or coffee klatches or anywhere else, for better or worse.
I agree. He is entitled to everything the Constitution offers him—a defense, speedy trial etc. However, there seems to be a preponderance of evidence that AF slew TB in such an outrageous manner. To be proven guilty, an accused person must go through the court system. We are not that.
Our American system of police enforcement also does not decide guilt or innocence, but their duty is to act upon the evidence when a crime is committed.
For us as spectators, it’s easier for us to make judgments than it was for our forebears. They did not have the benefit of video surveillance and all the other things available to LE now, such as DNA. If I recall, Aaron Burr did not stand trial for killing Hamilton, because their seconds turned their backs at the duel, since dueling was illegal in NJ and they wanted plausible deniability. Even though it was blatantly obvious what had happened, there was no proof of the particulars. Imagine if there were surveillance then, or with Jack the Ripper, or anyone from the past.
IMO, AF is guilty as sin, should continue to be tried as an adult, and serve LWOP. If I were a juror I would in fact pay attention to any exculpatory evidence, but I don’t think any exists.
JMO