Tuba
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 5,691
- Reaction score
- 65
There seems to be confusion over the portents of a natal chart versus the description of what has already happened, which is an event chart. It is true that what an astrologer sees in a natal chart for a human being is not pre-determinative. Not only free will enters into actions that the person will take but also inspiration, spiritual guidance, social reinforcement of a positive or negative sort, academic and self-education and more.
None of these considerations play ANY part in an event chart, which maps what has already occurred. Various people have already exercised their free will when an event takes place. Natural calamities have damaged a scene. Accident coincidences have created collisions. Freak phenomena have streaked through a scene. Now a sleuth who is detecting or an astrologer who is analysing can misconstrue something on the ground but it has nothing to do with forecasting astrological weather because something has happened, past tense. Please, please, understand the difference. This has been taken up in the General Thread in the past.
What was also warned is that it is very wrong to ask questions about life and death of an astrologer if you know that the answer is unacceptable to you. Do not ask. Furthermore, horoscopes are considered incomplete if the Arabian Parts are omitted. Just because a chart is marked for (D), does not imply death has occurred. (D) also stands for dire, for damage, for disaster. Do not probe or squeeze for more, especially if you have composed a personal rejection of what is seen. That is a form of gross dishonesty. Just move along, doing your own sleuthing until you satisfy your quest for a solution but do not tweak nor tease the oracle.
None of these considerations play ANY part in an event chart, which maps what has already occurred. Various people have already exercised their free will when an event takes place. Natural calamities have damaged a scene. Accident coincidences have created collisions. Freak phenomena have streaked through a scene. Now a sleuth who is detecting or an astrologer who is analysing can misconstrue something on the ground but it has nothing to do with forecasting astrological weather because something has happened, past tense. Please, please, understand the difference. This has been taken up in the General Thread in the past.
What was also warned is that it is very wrong to ask questions about life and death of an astrologer if you know that the answer is unacceptable to you. Do not ask. Furthermore, horoscopes are considered incomplete if the Arabian Parts are omitted. Just because a chart is marked for (D), does not imply death has occurred. (D) also stands for dire, for damage, for disaster. Do not probe or squeeze for more, especially if you have composed a personal rejection of what is seen. That is a form of gross dishonesty. Just move along, doing your own sleuthing until you satisfy your quest for a solution but do not tweak nor tease the oracle.