seattlechiquita
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 5,791
- Reaction score
- 260
Gotcha. Very possible, and I doubt they will do any time anyway. However, knowing their careers and their lives are forever ruined makes me quite happy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gotcha. Very possible, and I doubt they will do any time anyway. However, knowing their careers and their lives are forever ruined makes me quite happy.
Ah, no felony conviction, Schultz and Curley get their pensions. Spanier doesn't it, because he'd still be a tenured professor; he can retire, however.
Didn't he loose tenure when he was fired? I would assume he did. That's how we would operate on my campus: you are fired, you loose tenure.
sorry, he is on leave. Thought he had been fired. My mistake. Penn State keeps building shame.
He was fired as president, but Spanier is a full professor aside from that.
He's making $600 K per year.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/usedtobedoe/index.php?showtopic=2226&st=0
This is super weird - I cannot find him in any salary database. All salaries for public higher ed employees are public. Hmmmm. :banghead:
This is a bit convoluted, but it is related.
Today the Superior Court of PA overturned the conviction of Monsignor William Lynn. He was convicted in the Philadelphia priest sex abuse case, but he was not a molester. He was found guilty of Endangerment (and conspiracy to endanger) for putting the actual molester into situations where he could molest again.
The decision is here: http://media.philly.com/documents/lynndec.pdf
The Court ruled that, because Lynn did not directly supervise the children, he could not be found guilty of endangerment. While there is another appeals court, the PA Supreme Court, this decision may be appealed. The Superior Court has statewide jurisdiction and its decisions are binding on the lower courts, unless it is appealed.
Spanier, Curley and Schultz are also Endangerment, but they had no direct supervision of a child. It is possible that, if the Superior Court decision stands, that one of the Endangerment charges and one of the conspiracy charges will be dropped, if this decision stands. There would still be perjury (which has to do with Baldwin's testimony), conspiracy to commit perjury, both felonies, obstruction and a related conspiracy (misdemeanors), and failure to report (a summary offense). There is also a felony endangerment based on interfering with the reporting the incident.
Some movement in the case: http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2014/06/judge_makes_plans_to_revive_al.html
No, I do not know where it going.
Ugh! What are they waiting on?
By the way, I read that Corbett met with a special prosecutor. I haven't been following the race. Are you still guaranteeing a victory?
No, Wolf has pulled ahead by 25 points. PSU is not the problem. Corbett basically has been unable to do anything, though "fracking" is not a big issue.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/22/1301158/-PA-GOV-One-county-shows-why-Tom-Corbett-is-doomed#
One county shows why Tom Corbett is doomed
Have you ever, in your life, seen a reverse drop-off like that? A thousand in his own party writing in someone else, and another thousand voters also refusing to acknowledge that race at all as demonstrated by the undervote relative to the legislative races?
I should probably mention something else: Centre County is the home of Penn State University.
If he loses by 25 points, then he had bigger problems than PSU. However, I thought his re-election was doomed, regardless. A Republican candidate who can't win the vast majority of Penn State football fans starts behind the eight ball.
My main interest, once the election is over, is to look at his performance in Centre County. Also, to compare his numbers to other Republicans in statewide elections in PA.