butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
My answer is all of the above, and then some.
I'm donning my raincoat in case of any tomato-throwing...
Here goes....
I got frustrated watching the defensiveness of some of the expert witnesses testifying. (particularly Dr G and Dr H) The testimony itself was great, but the delivery......not so much.
There is a stark difference between their demeanor when questioned by the state, and being questioned by the DT.
I understand the passion they have for their work, and they have the right to defend their opinions and conclusions, but l just wish they could do it in non-defensive manner.
And WOW! Bringing up the issue of non-payment by the DT for the depo while testifying was not a good move by Dr H , IMO. It bolsters the DT insinuation that he's only in it for the money.
MOO
I'm donning my raincoat in case of any tomato-throwing...
Here goes....
I got frustrated watching the defensiveness of some of the expert witnesses testifying. (particularly Dr G and Dr H) The testimony itself was great, but the delivery......not so much.
There is a stark difference between their demeanor when questioned by the state, and being questioned by the DT.
I understand the passion they have for their work, and they have the right to defend their opinions and conclusions, but l just wish they could do it in non-defensive manner.
And WOW! Bringing up the issue of non-payment by the DT for the depo while testifying was not a good move by Dr H , IMO. It bolsters the DT insinuation that he's only in it for the money.
MOO