I was way more trusting of people before I went to law school. Now I have a horrible tendency to assume everyone is lying. I would cross-examine my own husband if he claimed he left our dog in the car alone and she went missing. It's awful, I know, but these things never seem to end well.
Same.
Have certs as a paralegal and advanced legal research from UGA
You learn a lot about the depths people will sink when you get any kind of legal education. And the depths some police will go to in order to get a conviction... justified or not.
@PigPong Consent Searches
“In order to conduct a consent search, the person whose property is being searched must voluntarily waive his or her Fourth Amendment rights. In most cases, the person may refuse to give consent; however, the law enforcement agent does not have to tell the person that consent is voluntary. Should any of the evidence obtained result in a criminal trial, the prosecution must prove that the consent search was entirely voluntary and the person granting consent was not coerced.
The courts have decided that the person who conducts a consent search does not have to identify himself or herself as a law enforcement agent, and that the person who grants consent does not have to be the person who is charged with the crime. In cases such as Hoffa v. United States, the courts have ruled that if an undercover office finds evidence based on a consent search, the evidence may be used in the criminal case.
Third parties may give consent in limited cases. The person granting consent must have common authority over the premises in order for the search to be valid. This typically applies to hotel management giving consent to perform a search. It does not, however, apply to a landlord giving consent to search a person's apartment.
Once a consent search has started, the person whose property is being searched may, at any time, revoke his or her consent. Consent may be revoked by comments or actions; for example, saying 'I want you to stop,' or attempting to retrieve property from the officer has been found by the courts to be a valid withdrawal of consent.”
Appreciate it.
I was thinking more of the scope of the search with a consented search though vs. a search warrant. Long story but I have memory issues and not able to look it up at the moment.