Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
respectfully snippedI've worked in crim law for a few years now, and I've seen it all. And I don't know why, but I just have a hard time believing it is SM. He honestly just doesn't fit the profile for the particular facts.
I also think it's a bit hasty to rule the boyfriend out. We don't know what, if any, interest the MPD has in him and what kinds of questions have been asked. I'm LG's age...and if I had been dating a guy that was almost 50 years old, had never been married, had an ex that had killed herself, and other than working for a prestigious law-firm doesn't seem to have much to add to a relationship with someone my age? MAJOR red flags. Hate to be judgmental, but I just don't get it. He was born in 63. I assume she was born in 84...just creepy any way you look at it. Sorry if anyone here has a similar age gap.
respectfully snipped
:wave: Creepy? Seriously? LOL As someone who has enjoyed a loving and fulfilling marriage of many years to a spouse sixteen years my senior, I take exception to that statement.
respectfully snipped
:wave: Creepy? Seriously? LOL As someone who has enjoyed a loving and fulfilling marriage of many years to a spouse sixteen years my senior, I take exception to that statement.
Backwoods...I can't get around it either...scenario: this thing is so heinous, so bad, and SM did commit burglary....they cut a deal with him to stay in jail so the real killer thinks he is off the hook and then they slip up on the real killer....or flush him out with SM being the decoy....why else would an attorney as good as Buford go along with all this and not be raising hell about it all.......why else would his hearing for bond be moved to superior court and judge Self delay it again......just doesnt add up......I'm not in LE, but I have served ten years in public safety on the fire/ems side in a small rural county....I know from experience what public sees and hears is never really the way it is or the real way it went down....especially in bad or graphic or heinous situations.....LE can, and needs to be able to do stuff like that to protect the public....it may not be "by the book".....but they do it all the time.....I'm glad they do....it helps protect us and we don't even know or appreciate it....
This is all JMO
Do you really know of cases where they have done this?
Did the criminal profiler just say that we still need to find the crime scene? Did he say that he thought that there appeared to be some sort of ruse in which Lauren came willingly from her apartment? And that she probably went with someone she knew?
Did I get that right on the FOX channel?
I think they want it to be SM sooooo badly. And maybe it is...but from the fact that they've removed his whole freakin' apartment and still don't have enough to make an arrest (and don't believe for a second that the FBI hasn't gotten back to them- their turnaround is impeccable) is not a good sign for their case against him.
Did the criminal profiler just say that we still need to find the crime scene? Did he say that he thought that there appeared to be some sort of ruse in which Lauren came willingly from her apartment? And that she probably went with someone she knew?
Did I get that right on the FOX channel?
I missed the show tonight...well, that's very interesting. Wonder where they got that from?
And if that was what was implied about the crime scene..really? That leads me to believe they have nothing and out of all the evidence they have sent to the FBI, I would think one of those apartments would've turned up something if it was the crime scene (and they've indicated all along that they thought it happened there).
I took the profiler's comments as being a generalized procedure for how an investigation should proceed along with his theories of how it might have happened. I don't think he has personal, unpublicized knowledge of this case.