I respect having differing theories. I just don't always agree that they're equally as likely as msm information trickles out.
For me, with what little we have to go on that's supported by msm (which is his anger/troubled demeanor) I feel like it's possible the motive is unrequited feelings/ mentally unstable/stalker behaviors/mental illness. This is what motivated him.
The theory that would follow would be his belief he was the wronged person in a (possibly imaginary) love triangle, and this inspired him to lure them there, or find them there, to exact his revenge on both of them.
I personally can't find, at this point, a drug connection 'just as likely' because no one so far in msm has mentioned drug involvement once. Anger, troubled, alternative school, yes. Drugs? There's no mention of it. Not in MSM. About any of them.
Does that mean I couldn't believe these people could be doing, buying, selling drugs if the evidence was presented? Not at all. My theories shift the more msm information comes out.
I'm curious what makes some people jump to the conclusion 'drugs', for motive. The location of their death? The possible affluence of the teens? The way Hazelwood looks? What his alleged 'friend' said in a non-MSM Heavy article?
An angry, troubled guy who had difficulties at alternative school shoots two young, well liked, athletic, attractive, school-involved young people (who were maybe seeing each other), in the heads, behind a grocery store. That doesn't scream drugs to me. It screams jealousy, anger, vengence.
But that's just my opinion.