GUILTY GA - Rusty Sneiderman shot to death at Dunwoody preschool, 18 Nov 2010 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am thinking the reason it took 7 weeks to tie this guy to the murder is because the wife has been being investigated , which would include her co- workers. The LE officals would be aware of who she was calling how she was spending her money. It would have started as a basic look into and got more involved as her actions became more interesting to LE. Even if she wasnt aware of the murder plan (which I doubt) It still could have lead to her workplace. Her past phone records and spending could have made them question things. They would have asked her BOSS for any company credit cards she was able to use.

The co workers may have been asked questions about events and etc.. somebody might have told LE some rumors which isnt really a tip but it lead the LE to look the boss and then they found something.

It would still be called old fashion investigative work.

I dont even know what to say about her not IDing him if she was shown a clip (which I think she was) of that video footage.
The co workers I could see as Rusty had a few people on his friends list the matched the composit . IMO the composit really does look like it could match alot of people.
 
What happened to the PC LE was supposed to have today?

I heard they suddenly canceled and gave no explanation.

IMO

I'm thinking it has something to do with a power struggle and or experience. Dunwoody is a new city and has never had a high profile case such as this. Dekalb county has a much larger DA's office and has experience in high profile cases as well as the sheer number of cases handled.

I can only imagine someone in the Dekalb DA's office telling the Dunwoody police/DA.

"Look if you are not careful you are going to ****** this thing up."

"Do you want this guy to walk?"

"Now cancel that presser and give this to us"
 
One comment, How would the wife not recognize the boss?

Goz

RIP and blessings Rusty. We care.

That is a very good question. The sketch REALLY looks just like the guy, except for the beard.
 
One comment, How would the wife not recognize the boss?

Goz

RIP and blessings Rusty. We care.

Honestly, if I saw a sketch on the news that looked like my boss, I would probably think "Wow, that looks just like my boss" and then blow it off. I would never think my boss capable of a crime and probably wouldn't even give it a second thought. And I'm someone who follows crime and knows it always seems to be the quiet, nice guy next door.
 
Honestly, if I saw a sketch on the news that looked like my boss, I would probably think "Wow, that looks just like my boss" and then blow it off. I would never think my boss capable of a crime and probably wouldn't even give it a second thought.

I rarely if ever would be likely to recognize someone from a composite, maybe some people just aren't that good with faces.

On another note if I saw a composite that looked like my boss (and actually noticed the resemblence) for something like a local planned murder I wouldn't think "oh they aren't capable of it". I always assume MOST people are capable under the right circumstances.

The relationship with the boss would sway the decision as to whether to call in a tip; I have liked many of them and often their presence/success directly impacts my financial stability, so there would be a good chance I would decide "that is their personal business" and stay out of it.
 
If Boss was "obsessed" with Wife then he may have stalked Hubby and learned his movements...

I really am, for the sake of the children, hoping there is some innocent explanation and she was not "involved" with him. I'd also be curious what co-workers told LE. MOO
 
I wonder if it has been traced back to a family member of Neuman.

He may have given them some excuse why he needed to use it and they didn't think a thing about it but when he was arrested maybe the family member notified LE or LE has sent investigators out of state to interview family members and found the minivan that way.

IMO, a lot of planning went into this.

IMO
I also recall an early news article said the mini-van seen at the murder didn't have any tags. Out of state plates (that are more noticeable) would be one explanation why a perp would remove them. MOO
 
I'm still holding out this was a business venture gone sour.

I just can't even go there that it involves Andrea.

No way,...........................hopefully!
fran
 
I rarely if ever would be likely to recognize someone from a composite, maybe some people just aren't that good with faces.

On another note if I saw a composite that looked like my boss (and actually noticed the resemblence) for something like a local planned murder I wouldn't think "oh they aren't capable of it". I always assume MOST people are capable under the right circumstances.

The relationship with the boss would sway the decision as to whether to call in a tip; I have liked many of them and often their presence/success directly impacts my financial stability, so there would be a good chance I would decide "that is their personal business" and stay out of it.

I understand but it was her husband and her boss. It involved her husband's murder so she was would be familiar with a picture of her boss. The picture looks like him. Sadly, she could put two and two together and ID him if she saw his pic. There has to be a reason she did not ID her boss to LE. This just does not smell right. I hate to be jaded but it doesn't look good.

Goz
 
Honestly, if I saw a sketch on the news that looked like my boss, I would probably think "Wow, that looks just like my boss" and then blow it off. I would never think my boss capable of a crime and probably wouldn't even give it a second thought. And I'm someone who follows crime and knows it always seems to be the quiet, nice guy next door.

True Lyn but it was her husband and if you were trying to solve who killed your husband, you would make the ID, at least most of us would.

Thanks
Goz
 
That is a very good question. The sketch REALLY looks just like the guy, except for the beard.

And so many instantly thought the beard was fake and I am sure LE did too.

The likeness is remarkable.

imo
 
I also recall an early news article said the mini-van seen at the murder didn't have any tags. Out of state plates (that are more noticeable) would be one explanation why a perp would remove them. MOO

I think whomever loaned him this van was from SC. Maybe a friend or relative. He removed the tag when committing the murder so that it couldn't be traced back to who owned it or him eventually.

Since they had not found the van until now it makes me think now that the tag was put back on it when he returned it to whomever owns it.

If the friend or relative lived out of state they may not have put two and two together. Either they realized it was their van and notified police or someone that knows something told the police about the van and where it was.

IMO
 
The co workers may have been asked questions about events and etc.. somebody might have told LE some rumors which isnt really a tip but it lead the LE to look the boss and then they found something.

Or the police were just doing their due diligence and checking up on the whereabouts of all associated males that vaguely fit the description. This took place during working hours which makes it a lot easier.

Sneiderman was killed a little after 9 am. That means best case scenario Neuman likely wasn't at work until 9:45, if he went in at all (I haven't tracked drive time between daycare and workplace but still). If the guy is normally there at 8 or 8:30 and then just happens to show up late that morning, has no verifiable alibi, and also looks similar to the composite, the investigators would start digging deeper.
 
I understand but it was her husband and her boss. It involved her husband's murder so she was would be familiar with a picture of her boss. The picture looks like him. Sadly, she could put two and two together and ID him if she saw his pic. There has to be a reason she did not ID her boss to LE. This just does not smell right. I hate to be jaded but it doesn't look good.

Oh I agree, I was talking about coworkers. Plus while some are wondering if Neuman was living in a fantasy world and obsessed with the wife, and thinking perhaps the wife was totally unaware....I just don't buy that.

I just don't believe he could be so obsessed he is planning to gun down the spouse, yet appear totally normal and not give off ANY strange vibes to the woman he is obsessing over, working with, and seeing every day. While I am sure there are sociopaths out there that could pull it off, Hemy is 48 years old with no criminal history, and if he were that twisted (and living in a bizarre fantasy world) he would have a more colorful past (even the company he worked for was ultra dull, not the type of place a manipulative sociopath would stick with for so many years).
 
I rarely if ever would be likely to recognize someone from a composite, maybe some people just aren't that good with faces.

On another note if I saw a composite that looked like my boss (and actually noticed the resemblence) for something like a local planned murder I wouldn't think "oh they aren't capable of it". I always assume MOST people are capable under the right circumstances.

The relationship with the boss would sway the decision as to whether to call in a tip; I have liked many of them and often their presence/success directly impacts my financial stability, so there would be a good chance I would decide "that is their personal business" and stay out of it.

I am somewhat confused by this statement. Are you saying that whatever impacts your financial stability is a higher priority to you than a person's MURDER and that a premeditated MURDER is "their personal business" if your finances are involved? I am hoping I have misconstrued this statement and that you can set me straight pronto. In the paragraph above that, you stated that you do believe most people are capable of murder....

This scares the hello out of me. How many people are we surrounded by in our lives that would easily look the other way, particularly if they thought we were murdered by someone we already knew, writing it off to "personal business". I might be more understanding if the reason they remained mute was extreme fear for their life or lives of loved ones, but financial reasons, or not wanting to "interfere in personal business"? Since when have we, as a people, come to consider MURDER personal business?
 
This scares the hello out of me. How many people are we surrounded by in our lives that would easily look the other way, particularly if they thought we were murdered by someone we already knew, writing it off to "personal business".

It is primarily a sense of loyalty, my current boss has been very good to me, he is intelligent, logical, he takes care of his employees, I honestly care about his well-being and I would not choose to do something that could ruin him.

The financial aspect is secondary, but yes a consideration. If the boss is the head of the company (usually is in my case, i like small or mid sized companies) taking them down means seriously damaging (or destroying) the organization, putting yourself and all your coworkers in a bad position, and intentionally wiping out the very thing you have all worked to create.

It may seem easy to judge everything in black or white, but reality is usually personal and complicated and many shades of gray. Many people in a similar situation would consider it carefully before taking action (especially if it was just a remote possibility/suspicion), others would just go into denial and not consider it at all if that is more comfortable and less morally offensive for them.
 
It is primarily a sense of loyalty, my current boss has been very good to me, he is intelligent, logical, he takes care of his employees, I honestly care about his well-being and I would not choose to do something that could ruin him.The financial aspect is secondary, but yes a consideration. If the boss is the head of the company (usually is in my case, i like small or mid sized companies) taking them down means seriously damaging (or destroying) the organization, putting yourself and all your coworkers in a bad position, and intentionally wiping out the very thing you have all worked to create.

It may seem easy to judge everything in black or white, but reality is usually personal and complicated and many shades of gray. Many people in a similar situation would consider it carefully before taking action (especially if it was just a remote possibility/suspicion), others would just go into denial and not consider it at all if that is more comfortable and less morally offensive for them.

Why would you not consider that HE chose to do something that ruined HIMSELF? After all, MURDER is a pretty serious offense against another human being, in a different league than, say, flipping them off. :waitasec:
 
It is primarily a sense of loyalty, my current boss has been very good to me, he is intelligent, logical, he takes care of his employees, I honestly care about his well-being and I would not choose to do something that could ruin him.

The financial aspect is secondary, but yes a consideration. If the boss is the head of the company (usually is in my case, i like small or mid sized companies) taking them down means seriously damaging (or destroying) the organization, putting yourself and all your coworkers in a bad position, and intentionally wiping out the very thing you have all worked to create.

It may seem easy to judge everything in black or white, but reality is usually personal and complicated and many shades of gray. Many people in a similar situation would consider it carefully before taking action (especially if it was just a remote possibility/suspicion), others would just go into denial and not consider it at all if that is more comfortable and less morally offensive for them.


Wow. Murder is not someone's personal business considering that when it goes to trial, it's The State of _______ v. Defendant. If you wouldn't report your boss for a murder, would you turn in a relative or a close friend? What about the victim? Does your respect for the boss rank above justice for an innocent victim? I think that crossing your fingers that your boss isn't arrested for a murder that you know he committed because he's a nice guy is pretty selfish and wrong.
 
I think whomever loaned him this van was from SC. Maybe a friend or relative. He removed the tag when committing the murder so that it couldn't be traced back to who owned it or him eventually.

Since they had not found the van until now it makes me think now that the tag was put back on it when he returned it to whomever owns it.

If the friend or relative lived out of state they may not have put two and two together. Either they realized it was their van and notified police or someone that knows something told the police about the van and where it was.

IMO
Right now I'm going to agree with the last paragraph, either that after his arrest perhaps the vehicle's owner realized it had been their mini-van, or someone knew he had been driving it and tracked it down. MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
270
Total visitors
432

Forum statistics

Threads
609,635
Messages
18,256,304
Members
234,710
Latest member
Lisa Allen
Back
Top