charminglane
Sea Witch
- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Messages
- 8,080
- Reaction score
- 34,697
There are so many angles with the only information the public has, and with the only information we have, assuming it's not ALL of it, what kind of information would SS NOT SHARE with the public?
Assuming this is all there is....... how do we know they weren't both outside, away from their phones? A man was seen in the yard saturday afternoon (evening?), but no reports if there was a boat at the dock at that time, since no description could be given by the witness, nothing was noticed otherwise either, sadly, sadly
What have we missed/what other angles could there be in regards to the information we have?
I just don't think Mr D was killed "elsewhere" off the property, with SS verbage, he may have meant, outside the garage being "elsewhere" and not necessarily INSIDE the garage.
Makes sense SD was alive when she was "abducted" becausei f it was daylight and boat involved at their dock, that would be risky for the perps carrying a body
Makes sense that SD could have been abducted by car, not risky as far as neighbors or boaters seeing them, through all the trees in the driveway, STILL the question is WHY?
Makes sense (to me, i should add) that SD could have been abducted at dark, by boat, as not many would see this activity from lakeside, then if dead, WHY? Why not just leave her
Which brings me back to the "LIVE" abduction and a shield, as FF stated, but shield from what? If no one else was there to stop this?
Also, live abduction, after witnessing the death of husband, or even beheading, she would be in shock and not make any noise likely, by car or boat, but may have to be carried or supported, OMG, I can't imagine witnessing that !! how would we react??
WHY would someone be in the yard on saturday evening? Was it someone they knew from the neighborhood or party that may have been there looking for them? Was it after the party began? BUT WHY walk down to the lakeside? you can see from the house if they were at dock, unless the person was closer to the house, looking around for them. I dont' recall anyone stating how close or far from house this unknown person was located at the D's saturday evening
Maybe it wasn't someone they knew, maybe they were just trusting if they thought there was no one who had it out for them, so answered door friday or saturday to an unknown, thinking no harm, hell we do that sometimes, if we're all home, we arne't in a neighborhood, so maybe not wise to answer to people you dont' know
maybe they were just outside when it happened
STILL, the WHY? I dont' even think the LE knows that yet, what else is there to investigate when you have already reached so many dead ends?
What is LE searching these days?
just some rehashing, hoping to find another angle as to the how and why,that may have been missed
I hope the partygoers were talked to well after the Derby party. Maybe someone didn't think it was important enough to state that they checked on the D's. (At the time)