I didn't hear that at the press conference at all.
No. You had to read it in the downgrading of the charges against him.
I didn't hear that at the press conference at all.
That one guy did, that's true.
I'm looking at this in its totality. This is a dad who by all accounts is a wonderful guy, there don't seem to be any issues with him or his family, and it seems clear to me he couldn't have seen the baby in the back seat at lunch.
Shortly after driving off in his car, he clearly noticed something was VERY wrong and pulled off the road into the mall parking lot.
It's surprising to me sometimes what people do not notice. It's surprising to me what people can forget and be unaware of.
But to me, the other scenarios are more implausible. That this loving father purposely killed his child, or that he went to the car and noticed his child was dead and then went back to work for 4 hours and staged that he THEN found him dead (as opposed to finding him dead at noon which would be fully as incriminating - so working for 4 hours and then staging the exact same outcome doesn't make sense).
Those scenarios are MORE implausible than the one where he bizarrely forgot his child (in one of the major scenarios of kidsandcars, adding a stop to his routine) and also didn't see him in the back seat facing backwards at noon, and then it took him short while to smell the smell when he drove away at four.
When I have to consider what seems the most plausible, accidentally forgetting him, not noticing him at noon and then driving off and not noticing a smell for a minute or two is the most plausible.
You have to work too hard - in my opinion - to make the other situations rational.
From what I can see the police do believe this was planned. In some fashion.
Or it could just be the father's own account, could it not?
What you are saying does make sense, but it doesn't explain away the web search. That was weird, and seems incriminating, esp. if it turns out it was completed the same day Connor died, or in the days leading up to his death.
I'm really interested. Then, why were the charges downgraded?
If this was truly a planned murder, wouldn't he be charged with murder 1?
From what I see, LE seems to be really struggling with how incredibly forgetful this man was, and calling that serious criminal neglect.
Looks to me that he DID love him the most. He just had a really, really difficult to explain brain process of forgetting his destination. And I think that's backed up by the new lesser charges he's facing.
No. You had to read it in the downgrading of the charges against him.
MOO I'm leaning towards either huge marital problems ie divorce or possibly the child not being his...again IMOO.
It's confusing me to. I find it very hard to believe he forgot he had a baby with him in the few minutes it took for him to get to work from CFA... but I guess stranger things have happened. I DO think that he knew when he went to his car at lunchtime... and I think he drove to a public place that afternoon, to draw attention and make it seem like he just found his baby... I'm not convinced that he planned to kill his baby. I think that his actions have made everything suspect. Had he actually called 911 when he found his son, I think I would feel much differently. When you have nothing to hide, and it truly is an accident, you don't need to stage a scene...
Don't need premeditation to get to murder...can get there through neglect that resulted in the death of the child. IMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Murder 1 you need premeditation - and that's my point. He's not being charged with planning this.
He's not being charged with that, he's being charged with neglect that resulted in the death of a child. Which I think I agree with. It's sad, but that's the way it is - this was seriously neglectful to pack that baby in the car at Chik-fil-a and forget by the time he was driving through the intersection that he needed to go to the daycare and not straight to work. That's inattention that rises to the criminal level.
On the other hand, I don't think he'll ever forgive himself for it, and his life is now ruined as is his wife's. And his darling little baby is gone too soon.
Interesting Cherie - possibility of a different father. Marriage problems can manifest themselves in various ways. I gotta believe they were having trouble and he snapped. Recent grad from UA maybe he also had financial stress from student loans. Combine the stressors from several areas and it could cause a breakdown. Does HD insurance policy offer much $$$ for loss of a child?
I also wonder if he was taking any meds for a mental illness.
I hope the trial is televised.
JMO. :twocents:
Murder 1 you need premeditation - and that's my point. He's not being charged with planning this.
He's not being charged with that, he's being charged with neglect that resulted in the death of a child. Which I think I agree with. It's sad, but that's the way it is - this was seriously neglectful to pack that baby in the car at Chik-fil-a and forget by the time he was driving through the intersection that he needed to go to the daycare and not straight to work. That's inattention that rises to the criminal level.
On the other hand, I don't think he'll ever forgive himself for it, and his life is now ruined as is his wife's. And his darling little baby is gone too soon.
Interesting Cherie - possibility of a different father. Marriage problems can manifest themselves in various ways. I gotta believe they were having trouble and he snapped. Recent grad from UA maybe he also had financial stress from student loans. Combine the stressors from several areas and it could cause a breakdown. Does HD insurance policy offer much $$$ for loss of a child?
I also wonder if he was taking any meds for a mental illness.
I hope the trial is televised.
JMO. :twocents:
Even if he didn't notice at noon, he would have noticed at 4:15 when he got in his car... and NOT have waited until a couple miles down the road. Considering LE said the car stank to high heaven.
Felony murder is felony murder...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk