I think we HAVE heard about the dynamic and status of their marriage. Everyone says they were very happy, very wonderful, planning to buy a house in the future so little Cooper could run and play.
Do you mean you're waiting to see if anyone pipes up with a comment that disagrees with what everyone else has already said?
Because I'm not "waiting to hear" about the status. I've heard plenty and it's all consistent.
I just wanted to add, that had the discovery been at his work, everyone who ran out would know him and have their own opinion of him.
At Akers Mill it was a crowd of strangers.
I believe he thought he wouldn't get caught and would be more likely to be believed if the discovery was somewhere besides work.
moo
I 100 percent agree with this. Any parent who knowingly leaves a baby in a car is criminal and negligent in my mind.
BBM.3
I have wanted to point something out about the "smell" that everyone keeps mentioning but have continually forgotten. The smell of death is unforgettable and yet NONE of the witnesses at the scene commented on any smell emanating from the vehicle or the body. So I'm not entirely convinced that the smell had anything to do with the cops busting him right then and there.
IMO what happened is that the father intended to make the discovery of the body when he went to the car at noon. He took something with him as an excuse to go to the car.
Why noon? IMO he felt it was enough time for the boy to die and before he'd be getting any phone calls from the wife or daycare center. IOW enough time to make sure he could "control the discovery."
He went to the car and heard the boy choking and immediately knew he was basically busted on camera and that it wasn't going to go down the way he had intended. He knows standing right by the car that he's on video camera. So he just walks back inside to the building (I seriously doubt he'd have done the google search then.)
He comes out later and tries to control the discovery by driving somewhere else away from the security cameras. But now he's in trouble because how does he rationalize not picking up the kid from day care?
What's the motive to driving somewhere very crowded? A distraction. He doesn't want it just to be him and the cops during the discovery. More people creates more confusion and noise. People notoriously throw sympathy towards the parent that commits this act. So he's making lots of drama about "What have I done!!" to elicit that sympathy and drama in the hopes that it would distract the cops. That IMO is why he drove elsewhere.
As far as the constant applauding of him being a stand up guy, my goodness has no one watched any true crime shows out there? Tons of people have been convicted of horrible horrible crimes and prior had been considered a very upstanding member of society. That means absolutely nothing to me except an indication that the person is likely a sociopath. Sociopaths are known for being very friendly charismatic people. It's how they mask their lack of emotion.
He didn't need an accomplice to pull this off. It's very obvious that all he needed to do was leave the kid in the car and walk away.
Just because the child was supposed to have died in the first hour or so doesn't mean it happened that way. Like others have pointed out there have been cases of children surviving longer that that. The child may have been in a seizure or comatose and gagging and choking.
There had to be something right on the scene that indicated to the police immediately that his story didn't add up. They arrested him right away. They didn't wait for computer searches or any more details.
IMO he slipped and said he heard the boy choking in the back of the car which is why he pulled him out and had CPR started. But the EMT and the police could see immediately that the boy had been dead for some time. That statement was his undoing.
And it's sad to think that Coopers last gasps for life in choking are what ultimately revealed the truth about what his father did to him.
MOO
I think they either didn't call him, or they tried and failed to contact him. Judging from how LE is charging this, I can't imagine either:
1. LE doesn't know whether or not daycare contacted Harris
and
2. If he was contacted in the morning by daycare, that he wouldn't now be charged with intentional murder.
That just seems most plausible to me.
There must be some other pictures of him, because the MSM articles have them. Where did they get them?
Police say the temperature inside the SUV was 124 degrees, and the temperature outside was 102, with a heat index of 107.
The little girl was limp and unresponsive, and began to go into seizures as the officer and store employees tried to cool her down. During that time, Trueblood identified herself as the girl's mother.
Or he just refused to answer his phone knowing why they were calling...
No two separate entities.What stores are at Akers Mill? Is this the Cumberland Mall?
What stores are at Akers Mill? Is this the Cumberland Mall?
And I've recently discovered Facebook photos can be downloaded and printed.FB and other social media account is my bet, which means those photos are accessible to family.
I do feel horribly for mom and other family members. They should not be having to plan the funeral of this little cutie.
But bottom line, were the forensic analysts to copy stuff onto thumb drive for family I am willing to bet my bippy that the defense attorney would, at trial, attempt to impugn the forensics on the devices by stating they had been "tampered" with.
MOO - LE is in a lose lose situation in trying to address the family's request.
I have wanted to point something out about the "smell" that everyone keeps mentioning but have continually forgotten. The smell of death is unforgettable and yet NONE of the witnesses at the scene commented on any smell emanating from the vehicle or the body.
I have a question. For those of you who have used "professional" day care (as opposed to a family or friend keeping children in their home) - would it be the usual procedure that if you did not show up with your child at the expected time - they would call either parent to check on why they are not there?
I never used day care but I still feel this is an important part of this case and I'm sure LE has interviewed the Day Care workers.
Assuming they called the father he must have given some excuse - even if it was at that moment that he realized, "OMG - the baby is still in the car".
TIA for any input on this......
I respectfully disagree......those 'comments' under a news story are some of the most outrageous comments you can ever read....since they are under an alias usually, they range from racist to downright ridiculous..IMO...I have read some that simply would be laughable if not so tragic a situation.
All the above my opinion only.
So it wasn't his usual parking spot? Did he park differently that day according to the coworker? (shade or no shade).
FB and other social media account is my bet, which means those photos [ETA being shown in the press] are accessible to family.
I do feel horribly for mom and other family members. They should not be having to plan the funeral of this little cutie.
But bottom line, were the forensic analysts to copy stuff onto thumb drive for family I am willing to bet my bippy that the defense attorney would, at trial, attempt to impugn the forensics on the devices by stating they had been "tampered" with.
MOO - LE is in a lose lose situation in trying to address the family's request.
Even if you set them to private. I had a duh moment when my husband informed a screen shot of the computer can always be done.And I've recently discovered Facebook photos can be downloaded and printed.
I think they either didn't call him, or they tried and failed to contact him. Judging from how LE is charging this, I can't imagine either:
1. LE doesn't know whether or not daycare contacted Harris
and
2. If he was contacted in the morning by daycare, that he wouldn't now be charged with intentional murder.
That just seems most plausible to me.
Or he just refused to answer his phone knowing why they were calling...
Yes they have. The First Responders stated that the car "stunk to high heaven" and Harris was also screaming that the baby was "choking' when he was obviously stiff and not even alive.
These are the things that made them suspicious of him right away and rightfully so.
That car stunk. And it likely stunk at noon when he went to "place his or in my opinion to check to make sure that the baby was dead.
And for the sake of argument. Let's just say that the car did not reek of death at noon (Highly unlikely) A child literally baking in their for almost 3 hours would produce a SMELL and an odor, death smell or not. How many toddlers do you know that do not naturally soil their diaper for that long?
That car REEKED at noon. Of either a diaper and or a diaper and death.
And it definitely reeked at the scene of "discovery" behind the restaurant. The first responders reported that to the police immediately. Which set the ball in motion.
Well my point is, that it didn't have the "death smell" that is so unforgettable. And I'd like to see citations of the cops actually saying the car smelled. I may have missed it but I haven't seen that anywhere. Just hearsay. TYIA