Why have they not made that public I wonder? And what else haven't we seen?
There was no need for Statement #5 of Ms McHugh to be made public for the committal .. whatever is in it was worth while for the prosecution to keep for the trial... her Statements #1,2,3,4, were quite enough to prevent him being granted bail, more than enough, really..
Also,.. it is quite rational to assume that Statement #5 contains matters that would be extremely prejudicial in the matter of jury selection, and not made public at that time, since the matter of trial hadn't been decided, and jury selection was in the future..
It is also quite possible that Statement #5 contains more of the same stuff that was in 1,2,3, and 4...(' we loved each other, I wanted affirmation, I needed to know his plans ' etc., the usual babble) but I , personally , doubt this.. I believe that what's in Statement #5 will be the reason why Toni is a Crown witness and not a Defence witness.. something she would hate being, but
cannot avoid.
Between Statement #3 and Statement #4 , the police interviewers advised Toni, with all the seriousness they could muster, that she should seek Legal advice , today. .this leads me to believe that she was in immediate risk of being charged with some crime herself, and had been made an offer of partial immunity from this pending indictment, in exchange for full disclosure of ... knowing Gerard's plans?? knowing Gerard's movements? withholding information? whatever it is, it is knowing something that isn't outlined in Statements 1,2,3,and 4..
So I assume she did in fact seek legal advice and was advised, legally, to take the offer and count herself lucky...
Or... she was so incensed at what was told to her by the QPS in regard to the other women in Gerards life at that time that she exploded and blabbed.. the foundation for this belief I hold is Jocelyn Frost said Toni had a temper, and she herself tells Ben Bassingthwaite that she said things to the police but she doesn't give a **** what she said, she was so infuriated.. either way, she was advised to seek legal representation at that time, by the police, who do not want a loose cannon complaining they were tricked later on, by not having legal advice recommended.
long winded, I know, lulu, but that is why Statement #5 is kept close to the chest of the Prosecution, and out of the eyes of any who may have been in the jury pool then.. Of course, the defence would have a copy of her #5, and what they will make of it, I cant begin to guess..
How I see it is this.. that when Toni comes up for her testimony, the Prosecution will lead her gently, but quite firmly along the path of what Gerard told her, and what she did
or did not do.... she is their witness, after all, albeit somewhat hostile...
What the Defence will do with Toni is up for grabs.. either tear into her, under Gerards instructions, because it's dog eat dog time, now, and portray her as a stalker, mad, a liar, or... veer off from her completely.. because her mere existence is the glaring and unavoidable motive , among others ( finance, murderous inclination, fed up, immeasurable idiocy etc) for Alisons murder.