Champagne4lulu
Active Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2012
- Messages
- 300
- Reaction score
- 34
I'm reserving judgement.
I'm leaning more towards guilty because for me, why lie about the scratches? The bc family lynching allison initially made me think I had it all wrong. Perhaps he was innocent? Then to hear doctor after doctor refute it, made me VERY suss on them all. It made me think they were not only covering, but being very selective with the truth. What for me started as some genuine doubt, has ended up tipping me the other way.
That said, I still think there needs to be something more linking him to the scene. Mud on shoes, CCTV footage, witness sighting. Something that contradicts his going to sleep and waking at 6. Yes, there is his phone going back on charge, but I'm sure the defence could shoot that down.
I asked my other half who hasn't really taken much notice about this aside from my occasional briefings throughout the trial.
I asked him based on what what he knows, if he was on the jury, what would be his verdict? He said there's a lot of suss things in this, but he would need more to give a guilty verdict. People can act strangely in stressful situations and he just didn't think there has been quite enough to convince him.
Ask your partners, friends colleagues what they think? Guilty or not? In here there is SO much more info than the jury would be privvy to. And they probably don't analyse it as much as we do so would be interesting to see what the uninitiated make of all this.
Lastly, I'm interested to hear from those who have attended. What's the feeling there? How do the defence/prosecution act?
I'm leaning more towards guilty because for me, why lie about the scratches? The bc family lynching allison initially made me think I had it all wrong. Perhaps he was innocent? Then to hear doctor after doctor refute it, made me VERY suss on them all. It made me think they were not only covering, but being very selective with the truth. What for me started as some genuine doubt, has ended up tipping me the other way.
That said, I still think there needs to be something more linking him to the scene. Mud on shoes, CCTV footage, witness sighting. Something that contradicts his going to sleep and waking at 6. Yes, there is his phone going back on charge, but I'm sure the defence could shoot that down.
I asked my other half who hasn't really taken much notice about this aside from my occasional briefings throughout the trial.
I asked him based on what what he knows, if he was on the jury, what would be his verdict? He said there's a lot of suss things in this, but he would need more to give a guilty verdict. People can act strangely in stressful situations and he just didn't think there has been quite enough to convince him.
Ask your partners, friends colleagues what they think? Guilty or not? In here there is SO much more info than the jury would be privvy to. And they probably don't analyse it as much as we do so would be interesting to see what the uninitiated make of all this.
Lastly, I'm interested to hear from those who have attended. What's the feeling there? How do the defence/prosecution act?