Waitingnow
New Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2014
- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 0
Well G up on the stand was embarrassing and like watching a train wreck
Not interesting at all!
Mr Byrnes opening address just sounded like he was making excuses for him and saying
the things that G would find difficult to say in such a way, up on the stand, because they are lies!
I have never followed a case so closely before ..have only seen court cases on TV ..
So like many others I am waiting for the knife form the prosecution to go in and twist!
Maybe next week when they get to challenge him on his inconsistencies and outright
Biased and skewed and made up rehearsed over and over again story
Part of me is so torn, wanting it to be true that he didnt do it still . For his sake for Alisons, for the kids.
But as I get more and more involved, caught up in following and searching and hoping and waiting for the truth the more I just CANNOT believe the story he and his defence appear to be hanging on to.
Sure all the defence has to do is keep the door open to doubt but how could anyone NOT
See the facts and the clues as to the truth
Allison is missing and then DEAD
It WAS Alisons blood in an inaccessible except when the seats are down part of the car and the car was only weeks old
The scratches are not and never were from a razor blind Freddy and all learned and experienced opinion says they are fingernail scratches!
His phone as put on a charger at 1.48am when he was supposed sound asleep and then taken off at 6.18am
These are indisputable facts the rest are just supporting evidence circumstantial as it may be.
There are so many items of inconsistency or question marks about his behaviours and his story that are too numerous to mention and everyone here knows them .
My favourites thought are ..
He said he used the find my phone app and count find her and later that day it was used and look there she was out the back!
He started panicking that his wife was missing within 20mins of getting up he wasnt concerned about her mental state according to his interviews so not really sure why he rang the police instead.
And the interview at the command centre where he stuffed up his lines around his father making their lunches and when and at what stage of the morning he was shaving and having to cover his face with foam and band aids
Okay .. So I am relying on the prosecution to get stuck into him next week none of this pussy footing around and nice questioning to ensure the jury doesnt think they are being mean or irrelevant
Or one eyed on his guilt!
I really dont want to hear any more of his testimony except that I am hoping he will be able to bring himself undone.
Not interesting at all!
Mr Byrnes opening address just sounded like he was making excuses for him and saying
the things that G would find difficult to say in such a way, up on the stand, because they are lies!
I have never followed a case so closely before ..have only seen court cases on TV ..
So like many others I am waiting for the knife form the prosecution to go in and twist!
Maybe next week when they get to challenge him on his inconsistencies and outright
Biased and skewed and made up rehearsed over and over again story
Part of me is so torn, wanting it to be true that he didnt do it still . For his sake for Alisons, for the kids.
But as I get more and more involved, caught up in following and searching and hoping and waiting for the truth the more I just CANNOT believe the story he and his defence appear to be hanging on to.
Sure all the defence has to do is keep the door open to doubt but how could anyone NOT
See the facts and the clues as to the truth
Allison is missing and then DEAD
It WAS Alisons blood in an inaccessible except when the seats are down part of the car and the car was only weeks old
The scratches are not and never were from a razor blind Freddy and all learned and experienced opinion says they are fingernail scratches!
His phone as put on a charger at 1.48am when he was supposed sound asleep and then taken off at 6.18am
These are indisputable facts the rest are just supporting evidence circumstantial as it may be.
There are so many items of inconsistency or question marks about his behaviours and his story that are too numerous to mention and everyone here knows them .
My favourites thought are ..
He said he used the find my phone app and count find her and later that day it was used and look there she was out the back!
He started panicking that his wife was missing within 20mins of getting up he wasnt concerned about her mental state according to his interviews so not really sure why he rang the police instead.
And the interview at the command centre where he stuffed up his lines around his father making their lunches and when and at what stage of the morning he was shaving and having to cover his face with foam and band aids
Okay .. So I am relying on the prosecution to get stuck into him next week none of this pussy footing around and nice questioning to ensure the jury doesnt think they are being mean or irrelevant
Or one eyed on his guilt!
I really dont want to hear any more of his testimony except that I am hoping he will be able to bring himself undone.