I've made several posts in which I said the prosecution and defense had reversed roles in this trial. The defense has a theory of what happened and the prosecution tries to raise doubt. About the exact opposite of a typical trial IMO.
Another example of role reversal is that I find myself agreeing with Mark Geragos. Last night on CNN's Anderson Cooper show, Geragos said: "The prosecution is doing what defense lawyers do often which is trying to stake out a possibility because the evidence is so heavily weighted against them."
Geragos also said the prosecution has "conceded reasonable doubt."
Another example of role reversal is that I find myself agreeing with Mark Geragos. Last night on CNN's Anderson Cooper show, Geragos said: "The prosecution is doing what defense lawyers do often which is trying to stake out a possibility because the evidence is so heavily weighted against them."
Geragos also said the prosecution has "conceded reasonable doubt."