That still would not have helped you because he is not charged with that. The detectives said they believed him as a whole. He did not mislead. He told his version of events.
There is no proof that it happened anyway than other than he said and there in lies the trouble. People can suppose and imagine all they want. But the truth is that there is nothing to refute what he said happened and it is even upheld by witnesses and the states own witnesses.
Just like drawing a bow, following a suspicious person they are both legal to do.
But in order to release the arrow or confront a suspicious person, a perfectly legal effort must be done. IMO
In some communities around StL you cannot wear your pants slung down so low (watching video from purchase of Skittles, AZ tea & blunts)
Wait - cracka' does not mean sex pervert IMHO (listening to closing arguments)
Nice...Make sure you use all the right buzz words Prosecutor sir...
I guess that depends on what you are mixing it with......
I think those texts we didn't get to see would have been enlightening. But there are some available if you Google.
JMO
The difference is that Our friend Juan, When he argued with passion, he was arguing facts. He had evidence..
This PROS does not. He is just ALL emotion...
Releasing the arrow = releasing the blow by Travon.Just like drawing a bow, following a suspicious person they are both legal to do.
But in order to release the arrow or confront a suspicious person, a perfectly legal effort must be done. IMO
The difference is that Our friend Juan, When he argued with passion, he was arguing facts. He had evidence..
This PROS does not. He is just ALL emotion...
From what I understand another person can do the second part of the State's closing. They need to let Guy do that, his opening was way better then what BDL is doing right now. imo
Inconsistencies normally derive from fabrication. The question is does one want to seek the truth.
The sad thing is TM put GZ in between him and his Daddy's house. Which is completely opposite of where GZ stated his was.
On the 911 that GZ made the operator asked GZ was TM at the club house and he said Yes. RJ Told TM to RUN and GZ validated that when he told the operator that TM was running. RJ account was validated there. TM then told RJ that he lost GZ which puts him at the dog walk.
Why would TM say that GZ was by his daddy's house?
Then say that he was going to go around to the front?
The missing minutes between the 911 calls is the time it took GZ to head TM off before he got to his daddy's house.
I guess it is like Natalee Hollaway.
You are seeing how weak the state's case is right now btw. Constantly harping on the same things over and over.
IIRC, he referred to him as a "17 year old man". I thought he was a child?
Just like drawing a bow, following a suspicious person they are both legal to do.
But in order to release the arrow or confront a suspicious person, a perfectly legal effort must be done. IMO
Bernie's losin' it imo. So far this is a bunch of nothing. I find myself asking "so what?" to every statement he makes.