Jane Jetson
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2013
- Messages
- 619
- Reaction score
- 0
He has told them way too often to use their emotion.. and to ignore the evidence.
What else can he do? That's all they have, imo. :moo::twocents:
He has told them way too often to use their emotion.. and to ignore the evidence.
I would love to know how many of you out there that are defending GZ have gun permits?
IMO
I don't this is true. He misrepresented the law of reasonable doubt, which is why Judge Nelson made her next comment.
Have you been to a local high school lately? Some of those boys have full beards!
IMO, it's a bad move for the state to stress that "*advertiser censored**ing punks" shows ill will and malice when TM used racial epithets against GZ. JMO. OMO. MOO.
Although I don't support name-calling, and do feel bad that GZ has been repeatedly criticized about his body... I did LOL at this.
I'm just thankful for a few brief moments of levity during this, otherwise I could never follow these trials. It's too heavy.
IMO
And we have minor children commit rape, robbery, murder etc. everyday in this country.
JMO
The state witness RJ under direct told us that TM told her " HE AT HIS DADDY'S HOUSE.. "
Her direct quote from testimony.
IYO will they come back today???
IMO they will not.
had to jump back in and remind those who complained about the prosecution's asking jurors to use common sense.... MOM ALSO asked them to use their common sense!!!!!
OOPS!
MOO
Yes, he certainly did have real, documented evidence to impeach JA's claims of self defense. That's what is generally needed for the state to bring charges and in that case to obtain a guilty verdict. Common sense and listen to your heart, are simply not enough to take away anyone's freedom ...IMO.When Juan Martinez asked his jury to do the same thing, people were like YES! That's what lawyers do. And the evidence was on Juan's side. It's getting silly and painful to read in here. BOTH sides are getting overrun with emotion I feel.