m00c0w
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2012
- Messages
- 3,507
- Reaction score
- 7,325
What motivation would they have for this?After a solid week of this travesty of a trial, I am convinced the Prosecution could give a hoot about convicting Zimmerman and are just going through the motions to satisfy convention when an unarmed child is killed.
They threw Rachel Jeantel directly under the bus and treated her like a curiosity at the carnival they concocted. They didn't oppose her 7 blinking hours of grueling, often insulting grilling by the wearisome Defense.
When relevent testimony, like that of Selma Mora ( and others ) made salient points, they let them slip into obscurity and refused to utilize them against the defendant. Are they playing for the Defense ? A lot of you have asked Why they called 'that' witness. Well there's the explanation , in my estimation. They just want to help free GZ and make the case go away.:moo:
Remember, this is nothing new. The same prosecutor that is trying the case was set to have the trial go to grand jury because he didn't think there was enough probable cause to arrest Zimmerman based on what they had. Angela Corey is the one that dissolved the grand jury and stuck de la Rionda with these shenanigans.