I am actually confused why people keep saying technicalities. It isn't a technicality at all she broke the law its that simple and then lied in court to the point the Judge had to yell at her and tell her to tell the truth and her actions aren't even the only issue with this case. I have never seen anything like it before.
The contradictions as far as I have understood do not have to do with the content of the videos themselves.
if it wasnt about the videos themselves why would she have concerns?
Well, CB was already a person of interest in 2013. Someone else had come forward to the police about him. Then, according to what they said in court, there is one email account of CB that is related to MM's case. We have no idea what this email account is about. He was also in the area at the time. These we know for certain. Also that he is a convicted pedophile with horrible fantasies about children whom he would make disappear afterwards (from the Skype chat). These paint a picture of someone capable of doing it, with the opportunity that arose. But these should be in the MM thread imo
Can you tell me what contradictions were shown in court about the content of the videos? I have not read anything about that.
Hadn't he just been charged with the CSA material found at his Braunschweig apartment in 2015 following a search prompted by his ex-girlfriend NM? He couldn't be tried twice for the same category of offence i.e. further CSA material found in Feb 2016.
We arent told all the days testimony but there seemed to be an issue I thought about the age of one of the older victim and he also didnt seem sure where this house was that they went to that day. We know he lied about not contacting HB. Other than that I have no idea but it said he was called out on his testimony and FF asked if had alzheimers or dementia ( I forget which) because of it
I think a phone was in Luz, was CB using it.
So we don't really know... eta: that is why I think we should not be saying there are contradictions about the videos' content. And the age of the victim is really relative. You judge people's age differently as you age.
I think this has been already ascertained that CB was using that phone. They wanted to know who he was talking to.
How was it ascertained CB was using it?
From witnesses saying he used that number during that period.
Yes but they know this was his mobile number. Nothing that I said is contradicted from this article.They think he was there far from definite.
So we think that our suspect was, on the day Madeleine was kidnapped in Praia da Luz, near the apartment.'
Christian B identified as suspect over Maddie after Met's call log
German prosecutor revealed Anglo-German police work led to the breakthrough in the inquiry since the youngster was kidnapped in Praia da Luz, Portugal, on May 3, 2007. Pictured: Brueckner.www.dailymail.co.uk
Of course that is why I said it belongs to the MM thread. Let's not hijack this thread
I did say in my last post that the content didn’t have to have anything to do with IG , MM or any other missing children . My point was that the police woman had a hunch about CB and she was right he’d buried a stash of vile material under a dead dog hoping no one would dig it up.
It’s unlikely a different judge would have a different view about the same illegally found evidence.
