If you were using dark web forums to communicate, why would you bother with more open email for dubious or illegal material ?
CB was known to frequent the dark web ... so a very pertinent question.
If you were using dark web forums to communicate, why would you bother with more open email for dubious or illegal material ?
Maybe the platform he was using at the time has since had its encryption busted by the authorities?If you were using dark web forums to communicate, why would you bother with more open email for dubious or illegal material ?
That's an interesting question. An eff-up on the part of the prosecution maybe in its bid to overwhelm the trial with as much anti-CB material as possible in order to secure convictions? Failing to see the bigger legal picture? And only now realising that it's in danger of becoming hoist by its own petard, hence its 'but the emails!!!' clemancy appeal to the judge!
CB was known to frequent the dark web ... so a very pertinent question.
Was this email connected to his Skype account? That connects Fs the undertaker and would there be any emails with the Kruse guy ?
Agreed ,hotmail is hardly the dark web.If you were using dark web forums to communicate, why would you bother with more open email for dubious or illegal material ?
Agreed ,hotmail is hardly the dark web.
A decision next Wednesday.Kommt der Maddie-Verdächtige davon, weil Inga-Ermittler schlampten?
Im Prozess gegen Christian Brückner in Braunschweig sagten Polizisten aus, die im Fall Inga Gehricke ermittelten – offenbar mit unsauberen Mitteln.www.bild.de
It's as good as an explanation as any, whether you're right will remain to be seen.So it appears that there were drafts of the stories appearing in das Buch that CB sent to 'friends' from his Hotmail accounts which have been legally accessed. Therefore, even if they cannot use the box factory evidence they could still use his emails. Not much lost hopefully. Jmo
These were said in the trial though. I would imagine they don't lie . Also there is mention in the mirror of a copy of a story appearing in a laptop that CB owned in 2017 in Portugal. Therefore that cannot be from the box factory raidIt's as good as an explanation as any, whether you're right will remain to be seen.
They're bringing evidence from an unrelated investigation regarding the defendant, now it's been declared does the defence get to see the alleged evidence under disclosure even though he's not been questioned in regards the MM case?These were said in the trial though. I would imagine they don't lie . Also there is mention in the mirror of a copy of a story appearing in a laptop that CB owned in 2017 in Portugal. Therefore that cannot be from the box factory raid
They're bringing evidence from an unrelated investigation regarding the defendant, now it's been declared does the defence get to see the alleged evidence under disclosure even though he's not been questioned in regards the MM case?
The last thing the prosecution wish to do is to pre-empt or prejudice any future trial involving crime against MM on the most nebulous of pretexts.CB's legal team are beside themselves to get access to the prosecution files concerning the MM case and will stop at nothing to get access.
Why else take a day out of court time on five indictments to question a senior detective on a case for which no charges have as yet been made.
Did the senior detective have any input to any of the five cases presently under trial, because he certainly has little to say about MM.
Snip
But S said he was unable to share details of the evidence as it was 'related to the killing' of young MM.
SnipMadeleine McCann suspect's emails 'link him to case': investigators
The shock revelation is the first time an official working on the case has claimed to have evidence connecting Brueckner to the 2007 disappearance of Madeleine McCannwww.dailymail.co.uk
"At the core is the problem that the investigation into MM cannot be separated from the investigation into these cases which are the subject of this trial," FF said outside court.
"The federal police have just one file but the prosecution selected only certain aspects for this trial. In our view that is not legally correct and we have right to access all files in this investigation."
Madeleine McCann suspect 'pre-convicted' by media in rape trial, lawyer argues
Christian Brückner's defence says his trial is tainted by him being repeatedly linked to Madeline.www.bbc.co.uk
He wasn’t that careful, his disgusting chat with PS was on a Skype chat, not in the darkweb.If you were using dark web forums to communicate, why would you bother with more open email for dubious or illegal material ?
If prosecution are using these emails in court, will they not need to declare all of them to the defence, as it could be argued that they were using them selectively to portray CB in a bad light ?So it appears that there were drafts of the stories appearing in das Buch that CB sent to 'friends' from his Hotmail accounts which have been legally accessed. Therefore, even if they cannot use the box factory evidence they could still use his emails. Not much lost hopefully. Jmo
That is the point.If prosecution are using these emails in court, will they not need to declare all of them to the defence, as it could be argued that they were using them selectively to portray CB in a bad light ?