Discarded by who....which chamberObviously a higher court than the one conducting the trial.
What grounds would they have for appealing a not guilty verdict ? They've already had their bias ploy discarded.
What was reported was "the competent representatives rejected the Braunschweig public prosecutor's recusal request against the three professional judges of the chamber as unfounded.Discarded by who....which chamber
I'm sure they doWhat was reported was "the competent representatives rejected the Braunschweig public prosecutor's recusal request against the three professional judges of the chamber as unfounded.
I expect the German Courts know what they are about when deciding who would deal with the appeal.
A very fair question has been asked.Obviously a higher court than the one conducting the trial.
What grounds would they have for appealing a not guilty verdict ? They've already had their bias ploy discarded.
Im interested in the case in the children's playground. Did CB say at the time he was taking a pee...or was this said later..if so when. It's very strange he's been able to get away with that chargeIt's not sunk in as it.
Proceedings before the 2nd Criminal Division in connection with five acts against sexual self-determination - file number 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22) - motion to recuse the three professional judges unfounded
In the proceedings 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22), the responsible representatives rejected the motion to recuse the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office against the three professional judges of the division as unfounded.
If the public prosecutor's office has also filed a further motion to recuse a professional judge, a separate decision will be made on this. The result of the decision will be announced by press release.
It's not sunk in as it.
Proceedings before the 2nd Criminal Division in connection with five acts against sexual self-determination - file number 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22) - motion to recuse the three professional judges unfounded
In the proceedings 2 KLs 213 Js 52790/18 (15/22), the responsible representatives rejected the motion to recuse the Braunschweig public prosecutor's office against the three professional judges of the division as unfounded.
If the public prosecutor's office has also filed a further motion to recuse a professional judge, a separate decision will be made on this. The result of the decision will be announced by press release.
Im interested in the case in the children's playground. Did CB say at the time he was taking a pee...or was this said later..if so when. It's very strange he's been able to get away with that charge
There hasn’t been any acquittals or convictions for any crimes yet.Im interested in the case in the children's playground. Did CB say at the time he was taking a pee...or was this said later..if so when. It's very strange he's been able to get away with that charge
So you think there were two rapists in that smallish area with similar MOsThere hasn’t been any acquittals or convictions for any crimes yet.
This is just the court’s judgement on the prosecution’s request to get the judges removed because they were biased. It was the prosecution clutching at straws and the request was refused.
The prosecution must surely doubt that they will get a conviction for a serious crime. IMO, they should stop wasting the court’s time and admit they don’t have enough evidence in these crimes and that their MM investigation is a fantasy.
Time for someone else to have their 15 minutes.
There hasn’t been any acquittals or convictions for any crimes yet.
This is just the court’s judgement on the prosecution’s request to get the judges removed because they were biased. It was the prosecution clutching at straws and the request was refused.
The prosecution must surely doubt that they will get a conviction for a serious crime. IMO, they should stop wasting the court’s time and admit they don’t have enough evidence in these crimes and that their MM investigation is a fantasy.
Time for someone else to have their 15 minutes.
Wasnt it said it wasnt cross checked with others with similar MOS?So you think there were two rapists in that smallish area with similar MOs
He did say at the time he was taking a pee even though there were public toilets were yards away. When asked why he didn’t use the public toilets CB said he was desperate. One of the fathers of the children he exposed himself to checked the area and it was bone dry . Yet somehow the defence clutching at straws claimed maybe he was just shaking after he urinated , yet the ground was bone dry. With regard to beach assault at Salema JE picked out CB from a collection of 8 photos when she could have chose none.Im interested in the case in the children's playground. Did CB say at the time he was taking a pee...or was this said later..if so when. It's very strange he's been able to get away with that charge
wasnt she initially unsure though? until his photo was widely circulated?He did say at the time he was taking a pee even though there were public toilets were yards away. When asked why he didn’t use the public toilets CB said he was desperate. One of the fathers of the children he exposed himself to checked the area and it was bone dry . Yet somehow the defence clutching at straws claimed maybe he was just shaking after he urinated , yet the ground was bone dry. With regard to beach assault at Salema JE picked out CB from a collection of 8 photos when she could have chose none.