Good point; although I've no idea what the copyright law states. But the trial reveals that correspondence in the form of a list of items he wanted removed from his house given by CB to his girlfriend was in police files.CB has written many letters to various people since he has been incarcerated. Would the psychiatrist be allowed access to them for insight or would that be forbidden due to copyright?
Well said. I think the dangerousness of CB & the pain & he’s caused many people, is something that people don’t quite connect with. It’s not a nasty prosecutor & a crusade against Prince Charming.Even if so, it is sometimes beneficial for us to be reminded every so often of exactly how bestial CB's crimes are as well as the lasting effects they have on the survivors.
He broke that woman's jaw at some stage of the degrading punishments he inflicted on her, which resulted in her being made fearful in her own home and unable to sleep without a light on in her room for the rest of her days.
‘Copyright’ - that made me chuckle & then frown. Because I wouldn’t be surprised if their system protected a suspect from an expert talking about their letters to the media without their consent.CB has written many letters to various people since he has been incarcerated. Would the psychiatrist be allowed access to them for insight or would that be forbidden due to copyright?
I guess we won't know, depending on how wide or narrow the remit is,also it may not be the particular field of the Dr. From the BZ report CB would not see him so he's only left with the case files of previous convictions of which he determined CB does not have a sexual sadism disorder nor is he a core paedo, make of it what you will.CB has written many letters to various people since he has been incarcerated. Would the psychiatrist be allowed access to them for insight or would that be forbidden due to copyright?
CB has written many letters to various people since he has been incarcerated. Would the psychiatrist be allowed access to them for insight or would that be forbidden due to copyright?
We've never heard the result of, if the evidence from the factory is to be heard.Let's say he could access the letters that came into the public domain... but I'm not sure how helpful they'd be since the ones I recall reading are where he's protesting his innocence and accusing those investigating him of having a grudge against him and trying to fit him up. I would have thought the Buchs (if they form part of the files he's accessing) would offer more of an insight into CB than any letters he's sent since the Buchs were for his own writing 'pleasure' rather than written with a view to other people reading them.
‘Copyright’ - that made me chuckle & then frown. Because I wouldn’t be surprised if their system protected a suspect from an expert talking about their letters to the media without their consent.
Please correct me if I'm wrong because I have not studied his writings in any great detail ... but wasn't the material in the books written as depraved 'conversations' to a fellow collaborator on the dark web where discussion took place alluding to child victims and getting rid of evidence?Let's say he could access the letters that came into the public domain... but I'm not sure how helpful they'd be since the ones I recall reading are where he's protesting his innocence and accusing those investigating him of having a grudge against him and trying to fit him up. I would have thought the Buchs (if they form part of the files he's accessing) would offer more of an insight into CB than any letters he's sent since the Buchs were for his own writing 'pleasure' rather than written with a view to other people reading them.
I'm certain the Buchs will be part of the police files and will remain so even if they are not permitted to be used in a court of law.Let's say he could access the letters that came into the public domain... but I'm not sure how helpful they'd be since the ones I recall reading are where he's protesting his innocence and accusing those investigating him of having a grudge against him and trying to fit him up. I would have thought the Buchs (if they form part of the files he's accessing) would offer more of an insight into CB than any letters he's sent since the Buchs were for his own writing 'pleasure' rather than written with a view to other people reading them.
We've never heard the result of, if the evidence from the factory is to be heard.
I'm certain the Buchs will be part of the police files and will remain so even if they are not permitted to be used in a court of law.
Please correct me if I'm wrong because I have not studied his writings in any great detail ... but wasn't the material in the books written as depraved 'conversations' to a fellow collaborator on the dark web where discussion took place alluding to child victims and getting rid of evidence?
Certainly his fixation which you mention of investigators "having a grudge against him and trying to fit him up" is worthy of expert evaluation.
My opinion
It's possible that the Judge in question is annoyed that Wolters has declared CB guilty in the MM case..bypassing the judge and the presenting of evidencePlease correct me if I'm wrong because I have not studied his writings in any great detail ... but wasn't the material in the books written as depraved 'conversations' to a fellow collaborator on the dark web where discussion took place alluding to child victims and getting rid of evidence?
Certainly his fixation which you mention of investigators "having a grudge against him and trying to fit him up" is worthy of expert evaluation.
My opinion
Don't see why should be. There is no prospect of a trial in the foreseeable future , so no judge to feel slighted over a premature declaration of guilt.It's possible that the Judge in question is annoyed that Wolters has declared CB guilty in the MM case..bypassing the judge and the presenting of evidence
Your synopsis could provide the answers to one or two extraordinary issues which featured in this case.It's possible that the Judge in question is annoyed that Wolters has declared CB guilty in the MM case..bypassing the judge and the presenting of evidence
Where does this come from?For general info, the Buchs are a collection of physical notebooks and sketchpads in which CB documented and illustrated his sexual fantasies.
Police leaks to newspapers , at a guessWhere does this come from?
Digital copies of them were found on USB’s at the box factory.Were the Buchs part of the factory haul? Or did they come from some other search? I've had a google but can't find any mention of them in the factory haul.
For general info, the Buchs are a collection of physical notebooks and sketchpads in which CB documented and illustrated his sexual fantasies.
Then there are no physical copies ?Digital copies of them were found on USB’s at the box factory.
Additionally, CB had emailed them to other weirdos on the net. The prosecutors confirmed this when FF tried to get them thrown out at evidence - they said they obtained them legally via subpoena from the tech companies.
I am not certain but GA may have also said they were found at the box factory on the Australian podcast.
Where does this come from?
German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said the evidence came via various sketchbooks and notebooks seized from the 47-year-old suspect. 'These are a kind of notebook with some very personal content. They provide insights into the accused's thoughts. The books contain notes and also pictures he painted himself.'