frank-cole
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 1,921
I forgot about CB being photographed in Hazel’s apartment block.As I said “ personally “ regarding my view of the parents and would like to think a judge would take into account the stressful nature of it being revisited again under media scrutiny .I hope and have no reason to believe the parents and policewoman who were there to not have changed their initial report to the PJ in 2007 or prior to June 2020 just in case the defence tries to use media led memory card. I hope the BKA got to do as much useful work as they could in Portugal before a certain GA decided to throw his toys out the pram and invent this supposed scapegoat because he won’t accept he was wrong.
This has been a messy trial no question and it really will go to the wire.
Dealing with cold cases in another country with no physical evidence is never going to be easy and the stop starting is frustrating. The treatment of the witnesses and victims has been shameful.
I do believe HaB recognised those eyes ,was right about his origin,height, mo , the terror aspect inflicted on DM whose jaw he broke , and the horrific assault of HaB.
CB was photographed in the exact same apartment block weeks before.I have no doubt the filmed assaults happened given their mo and the assaults on HaB and DM.
You also have CB in his own words asking for video cameras and tapes to be removed whilst in jail.
One of the big questions this trial is alleged video , be it the filming of HaB and the missing tapes of the 2 possibly 3 sa there were very likely
many more according to CP.
If the BKA do indeed have photo or video of evidence of MM with or without CB (masked) imo highlights the fact the missing video evidence listed above which has been difficult to prove leaves no doubt that the chance of the film maker being anyone other than CB , BARD .
Or you take it as another coincidence and he got it on the dark web.
In regards to the evidence in the MM case - I think you’re probably right about pictures. Closing the gap between apartment & photo seems to have been the main purpose of going public. Make sure you’ve got him at the scene to lessen the counter argument of “you can’t prove he didn’t get sent that”
Devil’s advocate - if this was not a premeditated abduction & instead was a robbery & a chance abduction, it wouldn’t have been as planned. I think he’d have comitted the crime before he was re-registering his car the next day. Imo that means the crime happened quickly & if so whether he would have had a camera close to hand. The Germans suggested they may know where MM was killed, which poses the questions - how do they know & why did they not find forensics,
As for the urinating in a park. Hard for a judge to make a ruling with complete certainty. Legally innocent conflated with factually innocent appears to be the go-to. Hes the last person in the word to innocently have his genitals out to children.