sds71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 13,487
- Reaction score
- 146,768
And there's John Doe #1
That’s the part I don’t understand
Dershowitz filed a brief asking the records be kept under seal and Doe’s attorneys argued against him
and Doe said VG never named him. She named Dershowitz.
The hearing came a day after a man identified in court papers only as John Doe filed a letter asking Preska not to unseal mentions of his real name, or the names of other still-unidentified people because it could hurt their reputations.
Doe’s lawyers attended the hearing.
So did lawyers for Dershowitz, who previously represented Epstein.
During arguments at the hearing, a lawyer for Dershowitz told Preska his client believes in maximum transparency and wants everything to be unsealed.
“I don’t care,” Preska said, drawing laughter in the court.
Arguing on behalf of a mysterious John Doe, lawyer Nicholas J. Lewin was the most vocal, citing the need to protect the privacy of people who have not been publicly accused of wrongdoing. Dershowitz’s request was neither efficient nor proportional, he argued.
Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article243745007.html#storylink=cpy