Ruminations
Eating ice cream.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Messages
- 2,565
- Reaction score
- 24,570
Well, there are three things.Isn't that the crux of this? So far, for the specific crimes the taskforce has found evidence to charge RH for, the family has been out of town.
They appear free and clean ON THIS CASE.
I take those statements to mean the family will not get a free pass on any other crime unless the evidence excludes them.
1) We don't know how long victims were kept alive, nor do we know how long they were kept deceased. (Jessica, happy heavenly birthday, sweet angel, is the only victim we have a clear clue as to possible torso disposal date.)
2) There is a highly credible question about the dates of the Atlantic City trip.
3) Even if the family is shown to be away abduction through disposal of evidence, there would have to be clues like the construction and drain cleaning and burning and staining, possible new tires, old box of garbage bags, which was hardly used, has been replaced with a new package, etc. I get how hindsight is a different thing from knowing real time, and I know coercive control is likely, and can cause one to see what the controller wishes to be seen. So for this reason, I'd understand if the other residents of the house would not know what signs were signs. But they are witnesses and they have seen signs even if they don't know what they are. (In the spirit of presumption of innocence: what they saw, even if they can't identify it, could be exonerating evidence.)
Don't confuse being a witness and being accused. They are different things.
MOO