thedissent
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2012
- Messages
- 180
- Reaction score
- 0
At the moment I still find my initial thought that the tip came from a closeted (married) visitor or a young (closeted) prostitute of the cruising area that saw someting the most plausible. The significance of Canada Day may just lay in the fact that its a special family day and it makes you feel more part of the nation. Being with ones family and children on a day like this and knowing you might have information that is so important for anothers, Jin Luns family, might have been the last push the conscience of that person needed to come forward.
The fact that the tip was received on Canada Day suggest that its probably called in. It was a sunday and a national holiday. Its an assumption by me but I dont think that there were many or any at all LE working on the case, going through the evidence that day. I dont know how the postal system works in Canada but I also highly doubt they deliver mail on sundays/national holidays.
To me, an accomplish calling in the tip doesnt seem plausible. I might be able to entertain the thought that a person known to LM with some knowledge could have called in the tip, but not an actual accomplish. For someone to risk being exposed now would be a sign of ultimate stupidity... I know human nature always seems to be able to surprise me but I highly doubt it is the case...
I have left the possibility of an accomplish, a Manny as not very plausible. Its what LM wants us to think and its been a big part of his constructed virtual life story. If you think logically it doesnt make sence. If there were a Manny he would have acces to the internet to and would know that LM wrote about him, implicating him in crimes. The constructed Manny persona and LMs openly writing about Many just dont go along... IMHO...
I agree. I don't think an accomplice makes all that much sense.
I also think you make a good point about Canada Day being the day of the tip, though I don't think because it is a family day that might motivate someone to disclose it any more than others. And I think there absolutely would be some LE working on a national holiday. A case like this, you're going to get some LE who are obsessed and hard working enough, to do so on holidays, weekends, whatever.
However, I think the fact it came in on Canada Day is significant, just by virtue, as you say, there would be more people in the park on a national holiday. Thus, more people to come across the remains. Given that this story has been huge in Montreal, if someone saw something funny-- looking like the remains of a human-- someone might be freaked out enough to call it in.
There are, in any case, any number of sources for the information, none of which need us to posit an accomplice.
Reposted from another thread:
I don't think we have any credible evidence yet that there is an accomplice.
Police located the final remains of Jun Lin in Montreal.
LE say it came from a "tip", which really could have from any number of sources:
- an anonymous tip from a random person who discovered the remains
- a non-anonymous tip from a random person who discovered the remains
- an anonymous tip from a non-random person who LRM has communicated with, but who played no role in the crime.
- an non-anonymous tip from a non-random person who LRM has communicated with, but who played no role in the crime.
- an anonymous tip potentially from LRM's legal team (LRM disclosed to his lawyers the location of the remains)
- no tip, just police work via data from LRM's computer, phone, apartment, phone conversations, or any number of other sources
- indirectly from LRM, who may have disclosed location to a police informant while in jail in Canada (or Germany).
- directly from LRM, who may have disclosed location to LE as a means to garner some advantage in sentencing if he pleads guilty
There are likely more options, but those are just a few that do not require us to complicate things and hypothesize accomplices and third parties, where there is no evidence for it, at least yet.