We'll agree to disagree. I've seen no evidence whatsoever the State is still holding the remains.
JMO
The defense in it's closing said just that.
We'll agree to disagree. I've seen no evidence whatsoever the State is still holding the remains.
JMO
Didn't defense say that in closing statement?Is there a link to support the claim the State of Ohio is still holding the baby's remains?
I really don't know. I thought maybe it was because the bones were evidence and couldn't be released until after the trial. I didn't think they were withheld for just being mean. imoIs it the State that's the hold up?
I believe post autopsy, the Coroner releases remains to funeral home designated by next of kin. I recall BSR's dad made inquiry about release of baby remains right after the first interview -- but he's not the parent.
I'm wondering if it's the birth mother that hasn't sought the remains from the State?
ETA: Maybe birth father made claim and defense stopped the order pending completion of her trial.... (I recall paternal grandparents present at trial).
I think its unrealistic to assume Skyler is going to go off to college now, and have a blast (and so what if she does, let her smile maybe laugh, hell). Shes been made out to be a monster, I think the prosecution tried her in court if public opinion in their press conference by announcing she burned her baby, they never backpedaled or reassessed the situation once they did find out there was NO charred remains and NO proof of excelerant. They steamed straight ahead for her. If she does go to college, she deserves to go to college, it's her right & the best thing she can do for herself. She was found not guilty of murder or harming her baby, not guilty of neglect and the jury added a note stating they dont believe she harmed her baby either and I believe that says alot. (They werent required to add that opinion)
Her peers have spoken she did not murder or neglect Annabel.
I think she's been through enough, I think her family has suffered with her and I hope she remains on house arrest for her safety a bit longer and then probation for a time with court ordered psychiatric care at her expense. I hope she doesnt get a day in jail, hate me if ya like. She should change her name & move away and be the best person she can be moving forward and away from very poor choice and toxic family. But not before requesting her baby's remains be returned so she can bury her in the plot her family has for her.
Edited: "mess" was not a good word choice but neither are many of them in my opinion here, grammatical errors aside it's IMOO
Assuming she can recover from the visibly precarious physical state her eating disorder has her in currently. Not saying this is impossible or even unlikely, I just think she's got a lot of work to do if she wants to take the opportunity at the second chance at life she's just been handed.
Respectfully disagree . The victim is the baby. The baby never had a chance at life because it’s mother chose not to let anyone know she was pregnant. No one knows if she was born alive, no matter what a jury decided. Because of BSR’s actions not to get an abortion and carry it to full term without planning for it to have a healthy birth in a medically controlled environment, we will never know if there might be a 2 year old little girl running around today. The fact that her paternal grandmother has been in court visibly distraught suggests that she would have liked to have had the chance to know her. I’m guessing Trey has long gotten over any embarrassment by now. Any one — family or not— has the right to make a victim impact statement to the judge before sentencing is handed down to impress on the court how it has affected them. She will be sentenced on the count of abusing a human corpse as found guilty on. I know it has affected MY sensibilities and I’m not related.
Didn't BSR's dad testify in part as a "victim representative" or something like that for baby Annabelle? Would that have any bearing on whether the remains can be released at his request even though he isn't her parent?
I didn't hear it was said. Is there a link? Thanks!Didn't defense say that in closing statement?
The defense in it's closing said just that.
If the state released the remains to him, I'll be waiting for phase two of the legal fireworks.I do know the Defense wanted it noted on the record (jury not present) that the state didn't return the remains to the family and wanted to provide proof that arrangements were made by the family, for her burial with plots etc.
The state may have released the remains to Tre...IMOO
I didn't hear it was said. Is there a link? Thanks!
I'd love to see what they said. It's pretty outrageous if they did.
JMO
Please share the link I have been hunting for that m. I'd like to view itFornshell is giving a press conference trying to cover his a$$. Here's hoping whoever runs against him next election wins.
I don't believe so as release of remains is a legal, custodial matter. If birth mom was deceased, grandfather could be next in line.
The victim representative is something I recall from CA trial. A deceased victim under age 18, is entitled to a representative. It wan't clear to me why BSR's dad (defined as the representative) was being referred to as the character witness for baby's mom. I don't imagine the ghost of Annabelle feels warm and cozy about her mommy dearest. JMO
Perhaps another member more clear on this role in criminal trial - anyone?
Please share the link I have been hunting for that m. I'd like to view it