The rebuttal witness was good for me to realize that when the 19 yr old (the friend of TM's oldest son), testified that SM got his tattoo in 2013, he could very well have gotten that date right. And, that the witnesses of AC and TM could have tried to mislead the jurors and the court as to the date of the tattoo.
It boils down to me figuring out what witnesses are being truthful. And, knowing that some of the exhibits/evidence offered and accepted in by the judge, if from Facebook, isn't proof positive that something happened on the date the exhibit/evidence may show.
It boils down to me figuring out what witnesses are being truthful. And, knowing that some of the exhibits/evidence offered and accepted in by the judge, if from Facebook, isn't proof positive that something happened on the date the exhibit/evidence may show.