Wow, that was blazing quick, imho.Cameron has finished her closing statements. Now Millard's lawyer, Ravin Pillay, is giving his.
by Adam Carter 12:13 PM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, that was blazing quick, imho.Cameron has finished her closing statements. Now Millard's lawyer, Ravin Pillay, is giving his.
by Adam Carter 12:13 PM
Pillay says there is a tendency for "laypeople" to jump from "disbelief to fabrication" when looking at a police statement like Millard's.
That but also this is by Judge not Jury.Well, a lie is a lie, no matter how you try to sugar coat it, right?
Unbelievable/incredible, huh? My guess is that, for some reason not really clear right now, DM had the expectation that the MRO would NOT receive its certification. I have wondered about that all along. I know it has been said that this certification was something that was 'coveted', and not easy to get. Is there any reason why this operation would have potentially been declined its certification?
I miss interpreted this statement by Pillay, I thought he meant the lay people listening to DM's statement, not DM himself. (?)Well, a lie is a lie, no matter how you try to sugar coat it, right?
ETA: Sorry, many of us have had many loved ones die and have never once felt the need to resort to telling a lie.
How far could a lawsuit against the coroner go, when this part-time, as-needed, semi-retired, at-will coroner, LOST the paperwork on this case? I wonder why he lost the paperwork? I'm saying that it is highly highly unlikely that such paperwork would be lost, and that if any had been lost, what a coincidence that it happened to be THIS particular case that the paperwork was lost.. so my conspiracy-theory-mometer is throwing up red flags to suggest that the coroner didn't want his paperwork analysed in a courtroom.. is it because he's covering an incompetent butt? Or because the notes may have indicated more reason why he believed 'suicide' vs murder? If that were the case however, why not produce it. Okay, so I get it. Is there no procedure written in stone for how coronial paperwork is dealt with as a matter of policy, every single time? This case should really have a coroner's inquest to see why SO much went wrong! I can get it that we're all only human, no matter what our profession is, no matter our career, no matter what the policies are, or precedents, but really? How many things in this particular case are just plain bizarro? jmo.
From memory, I believe the 'accountant' was a man who lived next door to RB. I wonder why he was never called to the stand during ANY trial?
I miss interpreted this statement by Pillay, I thought he meant the lay people listening to DM's statement, not DM himself. (?)
How far could a lawsuit against the coroner go, when this part-time, as-needed, semi-retired, at-will coroner, LOST the paperwork on this case? I wonder why he lost the paperwork? I'm saying that it is highly highly unlikely that such paperwork would be lost, and that if any had been lost, what a coincidence that it happened to be THIS particular case that the paperwork was lost.. so my conspiracy-theory-mometer is throwing up red flags to suggest that the coroner didn't want his paperwork analysed in a courtroom.. is it because he's covering an incompetent butt? Or because the notes may have indicated more reason why he believed 'suicide' vs murder? If that were the case however, why not produce it. Okay, so I get it. Is there no procedure written in stone for how coronial paperwork is dealt with as a matter of policy, every single time? This case should really have a coroner's inquest to see why SO much went wrong! I can get it that we're all only human, no matter what our profession is, no matter our career, no matter what the policies are, or precedents, but really? How many things in this particular case are just plain bizarro? jmo.
He also had some 20 hours to think about EXACTLY what he would say when asked for a statement.. ie.. I went to get a sweater.. Pedo and the cats were located in x location.. my mother went in the house for less than 10 but more than 5 minutes.. soo those trivial details which anyone else would have not been concerned with. Instead he leaves out, oh, I should inform you that the gun belonged to me, or.. I did check his body for a pulse.. or.. oh, I went out on a date with someone other than my gf and I really do not want to disclose it for obvious reasons.. whatever... or.. I took a cab because xxxxxx (why DID you take a cab??).. or.. I left my credit card and my phone at MS's place, and took my new burner phone because xxxxx (hmmm, why IS that???).. on and on and on..Pillay says the judge should consider what was going on that night when considering Millard's statement to police. He says Millard seemed upset, and he was standing around waiting for hours to give his statement.
by Adam Carter 12:29 PM (Cry me a river.)
Well he had likely been awake for almost 48 hours at that point.![]()
Somehow, I have (or thought/think that I have) info on the accountant.. but yes, I could be mixing up the IT guy with the accountant... but.. why was the accountant never called for info??I think you're thinking of LW the bookkeeper's husband CD who was an IT guy with a shop next to RB's vet practice?