rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,744
Ew-Laura's holliers.. update
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/381137-bayer-ag-pulls-ads-from-the-ingraham-angle
[FONT=&]ayer AG announced Saturday that it has stopped advertising on Laura Ingraham's Fox News show, and has no plans to do so in the future.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The pharmaceutical company is at least the 16th company to pull its ads from "The Ingraham Angle" following the host's attack on Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]"Bayer US has stopped advertising on Laura Ingraham and we have no plans to resume any time in the future," the company wrote in a tweet[/FONT]
Back to free speech. This is an example of what our "first amendment rigts " do not protect us from.. She used her 1A, and the government didn't say, nor do, anything. However, she is not protected from; being criticized by the public, being mocked by those who disagree with her, and consequences of her using her 1A rights (she has lost advertisers, and she can lose her job based on her comments, if the company so chooses). However, the government won't do anything to her. Some folks mistakenly think that one is thoroughly insulated by the 1A, and can post, or say, anything and not suffer a penalty. This is untrue. We're protected only from the government, no one else.