For The Kids
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,591
- Reaction score
- 18
Granted, an advocate would be more credible if she hadn't been convicted for lying to the police in the investigation to her family member's case.
I just don't understand her reasoning in saying that finding the remains close to home makes her think that maybe Shawn isn't involved after all. Or am I reading the article wrong?
I'd have thought that finding the remains close to home would be consistent with a family perp but if Hailey fell victim to human traffickers her remains could have been found pretty much anywhere.
Considering its in area Shawn was known to go to what she said makes no sense at all but maybe shes trying to make him look not to be guilty now which makes sense in my opinion.