And I'm not saying this makes him not guilty, he still pointed a gun at someone and that person died, I'm just saying can there be a single investigation where the police aren't doing something shady or could be seen as purposely wrong?
It is very effective. The jury has spent the better part of two days now hearing about all sorts of things but NOT about Alec Baldwin. Morrissey is sort of playing into this by constant redirect of these witnesses. She needs to just move along and not let the Defense bog her down.This strategy *may* work but it does not work for me. Alec Baldwin pointed and fired a working gun — prop/no prop — At a living human being. And killed her. All this misdirection of the defense does is more firmly take me back to these basic facts.
Why do you think this? I am not seeing it
I thought the same thing until the witness —MP — said she went out of town to see her dying mother. When my father passed away, I forgot many important things. I’m giving her a pass. Also this is not relevant information to AB pulling the trigger and killing HH. IMO.I don't know what exactly is going on here, but it sure seems to me that the police tried to bury this evidence by giving it a different case number so it wasn't linked to the Rust trials. And I don't think Poppell was being completely truthful when she said she couldn't remember any details of her conversation with Teske. It was only a few months ago, and this had to be a memorable conversation: a witness walking in and claiming that he had new evidence in what is surely the most important case she'd ever worked on.
I'm behind in the stream so on catch-up watching this now - this is completely and utterly farcical!!Very interesting things going on now! The judge has stepped down and is hands on with the evidence.
I thought she seemed ill equipped yesterday but she's very assertive and impressive so far today.
If so it will be an utter travesty because the tings they are discussing are completely irrelevant.I might be jumping ahead of myself on this but my gut feeling is the case will get dismissed.
Ok just saw it…Spiro was saying that someone told him that Morrissey was signaling witnesses on the stand and someone sent him a photo of it.Did you catch what picture Spiro spoke to Judge about. My L&C went to commercial right then. If you missed it, he says someone sent him a photo of “someone” while on the stand. Judge to go back to it”, after this stuff.
Oh boy, wonder if we will see this picture?!Ok just saw it…Spiro was saying that someone told him that Morrissey was signaling witnesses on the stand and someone sent him a photo of it.
<snip>
And I don't think Poppell was being completely truthful when she said she couldn't remember any details of her conversation with Teske. It was only a few months ago, and this had to be a memorable conversation: a witness walking in and claiming that he had new evidence in what is surely the most important case she'd ever worked on. <snip>
I thought I heard the judge say 1:00 (their time) before the audio cut off.Are they coming back for the hearing today?
You can parse my words all you like. But I think the meaning of my post was clear. This is a case that involves a famous person and is in the news every single day. The trial is being broadcast in real-time on CourtTV and on youtube. Lots of people have very strong feelings about the defendant and his culpability.In my opinion, this case almost certainly is not the most important case she's ever worked on. Likely it's the most high profile case (involving a famous and sometimes decisive actor and receiving national media coverage), and yes, a woman died, but it was, after all, an accident. I feel certain that Poppell has provided crime scene support for many intentional murders, and her work likely has resulted resulted in dangerous criminals being locked away in prison for the protection of society. I feel those are the most important cases, not the current media circus. JMO