He said there was a "shockingly high" level, but could not quantify it and his partner said that they would not speculate on long it had been there, or what the source of it was... Again, we're coming at this from different angles. You're convinced she's guilty as charged, so your mind will interpret the evidence in the way that best supports your conclusion. I don't mean in a disrespectful way, but that's just how the brain works. I'm convinced she's responsible, but not completely sure she's guilty of murder so my mind picks out the inconsistencies. Neither way is right or wrong, it's just we're wired. MOO
I am convinced she is guilty because of the evidence,not because I am programmed to interpret the evidence to suit a presupposition of guilt.
I do find it incredible,even disingenuous that anyone could believe in her innocence,but again not because that's how my 'brain works' but because of the facts of this case.