Link, please. You keep making this claim, but have yet to share these mythical sources. I continue to ask because it's easy to be snookered by slickly done media reports that the GJ "could have" considered ___, ____, ____, and ____ (which would only be speculation), in an attempt to make it sound like they had actually sniffed out the confidential contents of the GJ proceeding itself without ever saying (or doing) so.
Actually they apparently didn't even have that. By their actions, they had NOTHING to charge him with as to any involvement in her murder and/or rape.
To be honest, the actions re SA would more support the idea that the case is just bluster. They made a big deal of publicly dropping his immunity and threatening him with arrest any day now for supposedly not telling the truth (a claim for which they never provided any specifics or proof), yet "any day now" never arrived. And he had never requested (nor was ever promised) immunity for Holly's kidnapping or murder. So the idea they have all this evidence against him for those specific crimes is absurd, and probably for any other crimes as well, as they had nothing stopping them from arresting him yet he was never arrested up to the day he died.
