shefner
Member Since 2008
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 7,086
- Reaction score
- 15,407
"JP is probably a person with some knowledge simply due to his brother's involvement."
Wait, what "involvement" is being surmised here, or assumed?
MP hasn't been charged with any role in Holly's abduction or homicide.
For all we know, MP's total "involvement" may have been as benign as being present in a recorded conversation when ZA and JA one day said something about Holly.
But from what has been submitted to justify the arrests, there hasn't been a single allegation that either did anything to Holly. Just something supposedly to do with a (perhaps-mythical) video that somehow is said to pertain to Holly, and that no will (or can) give to the police.
The involvement I am surmising is whatever involvement MP has been arrested for...and I don't consider being present in a recorded conversation about Holly "benign." Each one of these witnesses makes me angry. Apparently, many people in the Darden and Parsons areas had knowledge, whether rumor or not, about what happened to Holly and yet, as far as we know, none of them took that information to authorities. Whatever the reason, there is no excuse for it.
I never said the MP or JP did anything directly related to Holly's actual disappearance. We have very little information as to what the investigators have against these brothers...or the others arrested. But if MP or JP tampered with evidence or failed to give information they had about this crime, then that is wrong.