Could she appeal? I don't see why not.
Could she appeal on grounds of ineffectual counsel? I haven't seen that this attn. did anything that would warrant an appeal on those grounds.
As a poster pointed out back in the thread she was required to initial the paperwork for her plea. She isn't mentally or intellectually challenged (meaning she doesn't appear to be in a psychotic episode or have too low or an IQ to understand) in such a way that would keep her from saying that she does not understand any part of the process and request that it be explained to her.
Could she appeal her sentence? sure. But IMHO not on the grounds listed above.
IMHO what cooked her goose so to speak was the recorded call. No remorse.
IMHO she got the sentence she deserved and the court is not prosecuting her because of Haleigh. They are prosecuted her and sentenced her for her own actions.
Off Topic:
RC sure hid his face behind his hands when they played that tape (according to picture description) If I edit out the dirty words I can only imagine he was thinking to himself "She cooked her own goose with that one".
I do have thoughts on MC but will take them to the other thread.
She commited the crime as an adult. She has priors. The judge only gave her the mandatory minimum. She needs to count her blessings and get herself together because IIRC another poster said she was facing 30. Minimum sentence, although quite a bit of time, is still the minimum. She got lucky.
ETA: I'm sorry if I might read a bit harsh in wording today. I'm not thinking harsh lol. It's all said within my head calmly. I am taking allergy meds for allergy migraine and it effects how my thoughts come out of my fingers!