As much as I crave more information, I would much rather this be the scenario than everyone running around spewing "facts" that weren't "facts" like they did last week in Newtown. That has to be a huge lesson learned in what NOT to do. So many things were later found to be untrue, like the guys NAME for one, and that the mother was a teacher at the school. But listening to the ACTUAL press conference from ACTUAL law enforcement, he did not confirm any information that was later deemed false. At first, they had reported that the brother was dead, in another town, but he wouldn't confirm any of that, just that there was a secondary crime scene. Nor the name of the attacker. Even yesterday, Wolf Blitzer talked with a local law enforcement official who was the official spokesperson, and he said that he did not know that the computer the perp had was damaged,and that they were unable to get any info from it, and that any information on that would have come from him. And then later in the day, a reporter on CNN stated to Wolf that the computer was damaged and they couldn't get info from it. Well, I would have thought Wolf would have said "according to so and so, that's not true".... but he didn't.
So, in the case of our girls, as much as I want to know more details, I would hate for anything not concrete to be said that sends people in a tizzy, possibly turning their attention somewhere where it shouldn't be. IF they have a perp in mind, the last thing they want to do is tip off the public that they have their suspicions about this person, because an old fashioned lynch mob would likely ensue.