Shelby2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,000
- Reaction score
- 423
I am going off gut instinct only and given the dynamics of the lake. I truly think that if the parents thought for one second they were there they would have indicated as much (or at least ONE of the family members). Thinking along the lines of the family wondering why it has taken so long to get the divers there, pressing for a faster search of the lake, more in depth, etc.
They seem adamant that they aren't there and if they go off of the LE original statement of "just because the bikes and purse were found there does NOT mean the girls themselves were there" they could be clinging to that given the girls record of always coming home when they were suppose to. I don't know...
Again, I go back to my question a few posts back...could the dogs have been trailing a scent of the girls that could have been ON the abductor back into the woods or off the bikes, and not the girls themselves? Could the trail of the scent back into the woods be where the bikes were brought back INTO the trail to be dumped...from the back side, since it stopped there?
This is where I get confused, especially when one of the moms said their scent was picked up at the edge of the lake?! But they are certain they are not there???
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/17/us/iowa-missing-cousins/index.html