To be sure, Roy. So-called skeptics who deride those who believe there may be something to the government cover-up conspiracy theories, while at the same time trotting out what are, for all practical purposes, conspiracy theories of similar proportions, is one of my pet peeves. Otherwise put, I am simply highlighting the fact that you repeatedly deride the Franklin coverup bit and yet you have, on a number of occasions, trotted out your own conspiracy theory. To wit:
Yet, afaics, these are two sides of the same coin (i.e., Johnny was kidnapped by a government operated, paedophile ring versus Johnny was kidnapped by an underground anti-government faction). Now, I have not a problem with you proffering the "militia" angle, just as I have not a problem with people discussing the Franklin coverup bit. Even though I personally think both are fraught with a lot of inferrence that is more steeped in people's personal beliefs than fact. Still, "what I personally think" is nothing more than an opinion and I can be just as wrong as the next person. For this very reason, I fully support open and respectful discourse of the various theories put forth, and I challenge your repeated disrespectful comments to those who think the Franklin coverup has merit where this case is concerned.