soap mama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2014
- Messages
- 714
- Reaction score
- 4,683
CR attorney called him an all-American boyI don't know who used this to describe CR but I think it is a tad bizarre.
CR attorney called him an all-American boyI don't know who used this to describe CR but I think it is a tad bizarre.
But there is no option to go easier on him, there has to be something that he perceived as beneficial to him. He didn’t just do the right thing to make it easier on everybody else.Police had lots of information. Once they identified the vehicle, they had the suspect. The suspect knew that there would be forensic evidence of Mollie in his vehicle, so he knew that he was directly connected to Mollie at the time of abduction and her blood evidence in the trunk of that car. He would have been told that it was just a matter of time until they found the body, and that it might go easier for him if he told them exactly where to look. Some type of coercion would have been used to convince him that he may as well get it over with and lead them to the body.
I’m asking myself why he led investigators to the body. You know any motivation the guy has is self-serving, what leverage could possibly be used to wring that out of him? Iowa doesn’t have death penalty to bargain with, so what could it be?
“I don’t know what’s going on,” his uncle, Eustaquio “Capi” Bahena Radilla, said in an interview Thursday conducted through an interpreter at his trailer home in Brooklyn. “I don’t know what’s happening because honestly, I know he’s a good person.”
Rivera’s father echoed his comment, saying Thursday that he believed that his son was innocent and calling reports of his confession “pure lies.”
“If he had done what they say he did, he would have come back here [to Mexico],” Eduardo Bahena Radilla, his father, said in a telephone interview from Guayabillo, a small town in Mexico. “But he’s innocent, so he didn’t run and hide.”
Suspect’s relatives say they’re baffled by arrest in Mollie Tibbetts case
My guess is it's one of two scenarios:I’m asking myself why he led investigators to the body. You know any motivation the guy has is self-serving, what leverage could possibly be used to wring that out of him? Iowa doesn’t have death penalty to bargain with, so what could it be?
I agree - I think any of those interactions that are credible will be looked at closely by LE to determine if they are even relevant. Like others, I am thinking he has some behaviors that may have escalated - I just don't think he drove on that road, saw Mollie running and decided the 18th was the night all at the last minute. I believe it was planned and something he thought about before that evening. IMO.I don't know if I believe all these after-the-fact stories. They strike me as a bit of hysteria, like the media article that was posted a couple of days ago where someone un-named received some sort of contact from the suspect on Facebook and the recipient of the unknown type of contact did not respond. It's like everyone is thinking "it could have been me!"
Yes, it could have been anyone, but it wasn't. It was Mollie. Interactions with others before and after her abduction and murder do not mean that those people were potential victims. It came down to Mollie being an easy target on July 18 and that's why he chose her.
I'm from the midwest, and admittedly work in an office environment, but I don't tell anybody when I'm leaving. Just up and leave. And, I'm an hourly employee. I do fill out a time-sheet every two weeks, but it's self reported. It wouldn't surprise me if he didn't have to report to anyone he was done. Especially working on a farm.I’m from NYC so I guess I don’t really understand how it works in small town areas. But where I am from we usually clock out, write what time we get in/leave and/or notify a supervisor or someone on staff that is higher up to let them know we are done for the day and are leaving. We don’t just go as we please. We have set hours but there are ways to determine when we’ve actually left work.
I'd say probably nothingMy question is, what would he have done if she'd flirted back?
But there is no option to go easier on him, there has to be something that he perceived as beneficial to him. He didn’t just do the right thing to make it easier on everybody else.
I am curious how they identified him based on the vehicle when he had no license according to the news stories? the registration/license had to be tied to him somehow?Police had lots of information. Once they identified the vehicle, they had the suspect. The suspect knew that there would be forensic evidence of Mollie in his vehicle, so he knew that he was directly connected to Mollie at the time of abduction and her blood evidence in the trunk of that car. He would have been told that it was just a matter of time until they found the body, and that it might go easier for him if he told them exactly where to look. Some type of coercion would have been used to convince him that he may as well get it over with and lead them to the body.
Where there are only a handful of black cars in town, process of elimination. He was probably still driving that same car the day he was arrested.I am curious how they identified him based on the vehicle when he had no license according to the news stories? the registration/license had to be tied to him somehow?
I remember reading on here that a local LE Officer viewing the tapes, remembered the car from a previous ticket encounter, and that helped lead them to his identity. I do not remember if there was a link provided.I am curious how they identified him based on the vehicle when he had no license according to the news stories? the registration/license had to be tied to him somehow?
Maybe he dropped a pin in Google Maps on his phone so he wouldn't FORGET where he hid her.The thing about locals and gravel roads - we don’t know them by name. If you ask me where my regular fishing spot is, I can only tell you that it’s along the next-to-last gravel road before the highway meets the interstate. If you wanted to know what road that is I’d need to look at my phone. And I’ve driven by that road a dozen times per week for the past twelve years.
I read in a article he carried her 20 plus meters which is 62 foot into the corn field!
Didn’t he also live in a trailer with other workers as well?
We expect the attorney to spin it in his favor though, sadly
Some sort of insanity defense most likely. His guilt is not in question, and to defend him on those grounds is a recipe for defeat.
Ffs, joggers running around packing heat is not going to make the community safer.
But there is no option to go easier on him, there has to be something that he perceived as beneficial to him. He didn’t just do the right thing to make it easier on everybody else.
I remember reading on here that a local LE Officer viewing the tapes, remembered the car from a previous ticket encounter, and that helped lead them to his identity. I do not remember if there was a link provided.