Rigatoni999
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 921
Getting my popcorn ready for 48 Hours
I recommend you read the PCA again.The PCA does not say the mask ONLY covered the mouth and nose. Words matter, and small mistakes are how bad info gets started.
Does anyone else think this might be some kind of revenge killing??? He seems to think the laws don't apply to him. I wonder if someone in that house reported him to the police for various reasons ( maybe stalking, assault, or something else). He applied for the an internship with the Police dept. Could that have messed up his chance with that or the Phd program he was pursuing? Just some random thoughts.... JMOA few random observations:
1.) Is it me, or is this guy pulled over by police a lot for someone supposedly in criminology and academia?
2.) I am hoping and praying that DM was given the opportunity to select BK from a photo lineup prior to the arrest. How great would it be if she was shown several photographs and was able to pick him out based on his appearance over the mask.
3.) First timer? Since he seems as though he may have a proclivity for running his mouth on message boards and social media groups, I hope they are able to find his other accounts and history and see if he may be connected to other cases over the years. He's 28. Dahmer killed his first victim when he was 18. Apparently 27 is about the average time a SK starts killing, so I guess that would be correct, but how many go straight to a mass killing?
4.) Am I correct that both KC and MM worked at a vegan restaurant? I wonder if there are any records of BK being in there. It would seem pretty likely that if that is true, he could have certainly been in there to check out vegan options (not that far) and came upon one of the girls, tried his pathetic attempt at "flirting" and got shot down.
No doubt they will use that, but I believe the jury will understand and see clearly once prosecution/LE/FBI explain the 2 year difference... they could also say they didn't want to throw the perp off/scare him with the 2015 announcement if that had happened.They did explain it, but will the defense attorney not make a point that they are "shaping" the evidence to fit the suspect. Mind you, I'm playing Devils advocate here because that is precisely what the Defense attorney will be. In another train of thought I think they have the mass murderer in custody and he is the one.
Maybe no one answered his questionnaire so he decided to do his own research? I think once he started, he couldn’t stop himself—probably the first time in life he felt like he was the one in charge. Probably felt invincible until he noticed the missing sheath.I don't know. Whole thing is sick & twisted.
Pages & pages ago, iirc you asked something like ' why take your phone with you at all? ( if you're not going to use it in the crime and don't need it there. )
As he probably wasn't wearing a go pro ( which WS-ers had previously speculated about) & the whole act was too quick & frenetic for filming with his phone, could he have audio recorded instead, from his pocket?
IDK the proportion of perps who use tech to record their acts, although yes have heard it's getting more common.
From the "breaking windows and doors down" to gain entrance -- I got the impression that it was a "no knock" warrant. They could just bust in and find the suspect.An irrelative question. I jump back into websleuth again after taking a break for 4 years. I read the news LE broke windows and doors to arrest BK. But do they really just that dramatic? I though the dramatic scene we see in movies are for visual effects only. Can they just knock the door and ask him to step out (with guns pointing at the doors). Who will pay the fees to fix the damages?
Just wondering if people who are or may be questioning the veracity of LE's accusations of BK that he committed the 4 murders & felony burglary, have a scenario in mind in which BK would not want to say "what really happened" & start the process of exonerating himself by giving some details to LE right away about why the "indicators" (for lack of a better word) in the PCA that he was involved or committed the crimes himself is incorrect?Possible IMO. I am trying to think outside of the box
@CindizziHere’s more photos and videos.
Looks like the mattresses are in some type of zippered covers ( flimsy white ones). Imo
Looks like a bed frame is wrapped in black material in video.
I agree with others that one would think they would have used a bigger enclosed moving truck or van instead of cramming them in pickups!
Bad optics to me.. doesn’t say “ handle with care” IYKWIM
Maybe he saw her, maybe he didn't. There could be other reasons.But that's the only thing that makes sense to me. He didn't see her, or she would be dead. Imo.
I read that as...they found important items that have his DNA on them in PA that match the DNA on the sheath found in ID.Important evidence...Wonder where Nancy got her info and how reliable it is
Right...and if it's bad optics for us, it's an open door for the defense. (And not just about the mattresses). ImhoHere’s more photos and videos.
Looks like the mattresses are in some type of zippered covers ( flimsy white ones). Imo
Looks like a bed frame is wrapped in black material in video.
I agree with others that one would think they would have used a bigger enclosed moving truck or van instead of cramming them in pickups!
Bad optics to me.. doesn’t say “ handle with care” IYKWIM
Probably trying to get himself free publicity.Defense lawyers always be "defensin".
there would be a mad rush to find a bushy eyebrowed half brother whose Dad is his Dad.If they swabbed him and the dna didn’t match (this would assume he’s dad is not his biological father) would we know about it yet?