He strikes me as the kind of personality that would think getting/asking for help from anyone would mean he wasn't intelligent enough to plan this on his own. I don't think his ego would allow him to collaborate with anyone on his home invasion murders...he just too vain, AJMO.
There are evil people in this world who do not have any feelings or remorse in causing the suffering you describe.
Considering they know he was a the least stalking the house they would most likely ask for those records with subpoenas. Didn't the PCA site his phone's whereabouts on an August 2022 date?I'm currently trying to find out from anyone here if the second warrant, as explained in the PCA, means that investigators had remote access to BK's detailed phone internet use between June 22 to December 23. My interpretation from the definition of Pen Register and Trap and /trace in Wikipedia is that from 23 December LE would have had remote access to any internet activity BK conducted on his phone and that would include social media. However I may very much be wrong about that as I am no expert. I wonder if there is any verified expert here who could clear this up?
ETA, I think I could be clearer. I wonder if the second warrant allowed investigators to peruse detailed records of BK's phone internet use between 22 June and 23 Dec when the warrant became active/approved or whatever and LE were able to trap and trace and watch BK's current detailed internet use (ie in real time from 23 December inwards). LE didn't get the historical ping data until 23rd Dec, that much is clear to me, but at the same time were they given records, detailed ones, of his internet usage, social media sites visited, calls made, google location data etc in the months prior to the murders? Sorry for long winded, trying to understand this stuff is quite the struggle for me.
Source: Pen register - Wikipedia
Trap and trace device - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I don't know. Everything occurs on a continuum, and killing four strangers in a house with a knife in the night, if this is what he really came for, would be a stretch for a top-end serial killer. The entire crime seems to be edging toward grandiosity, and I wondered about a somatic problem when reading about all that snow vision. But this is me putting together the few pieces we can see of the puzzle and guessing at the rest which means I might be running right off the rails. I'm convinced he committed the crime to experience the taking of a human life, but there are other more-likely-to-be-successful ways of killing, including some that are legal.
The pain and devastation is intentional, the only remorse felt by people who commit these kinds of senseless murders is the remorse of being caught.
I'm sure that with time the judicial system will allow us the information needed to get a better idea of what really happened in this case.
IMO pawn shop perhaps?
I am guessing the triggers were everything coming to a head in his life and what he might see as "his failures".
He went somewhere after his killing spree and someone must have seen him. My late husband used to help friends butcher steers. He was a mess when he came home, with blood in every pore. I don't care how hard he scrubbed himself, there would be blood caked under his nails and cuticles. If he walked across an interior floor, there would be blood. I just read there's a sealed search warrant for his apt.That search is going to be or was, very revealing. (search his name on twitter)
You’re right, it would be nearly impossible to escape trace physical evidence. It is my sincere hope (and I believe it’s probable) that the search warrants for his car, apartment and person, all resulted in the discovery of significant physical evidence that will result in a jury’s swift deliberation and return of a very guilty verdict… regardless of whatever twisted production the defense tries to put on at trial. God-willing anyway.
Yes, Aug 21 was a traffic stop, during that stop he gave LE is phone number. (Page 10)
If confer, you mean that he was in anonymous communication with other like-minded killers (or want-be-killers) on the dark web, I would not be surprised to learn that. But if you mean he was conferring in real-time with a person he knows and he's known to them, I would find that very (very) unlikely.
WSU students: Kohberger spoke up in class — except when Moscow killings were the topic
WSU students: Kohberger spoke up in class — except when Moscow killings were the topic
In his Washington State Ph.D. program in criminology, suspect Bryan Kohberger showed himself to be academic minded, and condescending to women, classmates said.www.yahoo.com
During class, Kohberger, 28, appeared academic minded and didn’t shy away from speaking up, including challenging his classmates, said Roberts, and another master’s degree student who the Statesman granted anonymity to answer emailed questions.
Kohberger’s enthusiasm for his area of study — understanding the criminal mind — was regularly on display, they said.
“Bryan only talked about his interest in forensic psychology,” the master’s student told the Statesman. “He was an incredibly strong student and talked during class every time.”
“He sat front and center, and was not hiding or tucking back in the back,” Roberts added. “He was right there in the middle of it.”
As a result, Kohberger’s non-participation in a lengthy conversation about the Moscow homicides stands out in retrospect, said the master’s student. The person said they had four classes with the man now sitting in the Latah County Jail, including a courts and legal process class where the killings were discussed before the semester ended the week of Dec. 12.
“He was completely silent,” Kohberger’s classmate said.
I don't see any loss of dignity in answering some questions asked about a classmate's behavior or demeanor who's just been arrested for four savage murders. What is there to hide? If you observed a personality up close and personal then you did. If you want to talk about it, you do. If BK had been killed by police in a stand off at arrested warrant time, wouldn't reporters still record any and all information from people who knew him about his existence? Unless someone is slated to later testify in court proceedings or a judge has ordered them not to speak, I don't see why they can't answer any question they decide they want to about BK or decline to answer them.
