At least whatever the spots are , they'll be tested !Maybe he suffers from nosebleeds?
At least whatever the spots are , they'll be tested !Maybe he suffers from nosebleeds?
We can run but we can't hide when it comes to browsers these days. BK isn't as smart as he thinks he is.Ahh, that’s right! I so should’ve known that seeing as my tv has a built-in browser of its own lol. Oops
And anything that they won't use in court if it is exculpatory.The prosecution must share everything that they will be using in court.
I’d expect him to shower though, so it’s weird. I can’t wait to hear what they found in those trash bags, and the result of swabs of his car. No way he got every drop. This case is already incredibly strong, but a slam dunk is on the way I think.Wasn't he back at his apartment by 5:30am or so? That's only an hour, if he was covered in blood (especially on his clothes) it could still stain a porous surface like a mattress.
I'm inclined to believe that once the surviving roommates knew something was terribly wrong, they fled the house ?Do we have any informations on how many people went the house before LE got there? Do we know how disturbed was the scene and if the could see the whole scenario? I got very curious on that matter because I do recall the JonBenet Ramsey that one of the odd things that happened was that her family invited neighbors in and how this disrupted the whole crime scene.
Marshall’s receipts will only list the department. So at most the line for it would read something along the lines of footwear/shoes. They *might* be able to get the brand from the store the Marshall’s ticket came from upon their item look-up but that’s only if the sales associate input that detailed information upon creation of the original ticket, which back when I once upon a time worked for a lone Marshall’s Shoe Shop we for the most part only made descriptive entries for higher end/designer items.Wonder if that's what could be on the Marshall's receipt? One pair of VANS, could they be so lucky?
*Since they weren't recovered at his residence
Nothing confirmed, you're right on with just the tag.Question: there’s a lot of speculation about a black Dickies jumpsuit, has that been confirmed?
Could it have been a Dickies face mask or baclava type mask or?
The only thing I noted from from the released docs was a “Dickies” tag?
Did I miss something?
thanks in advance !
Firesticks can also remotely link to CCTV security cameras, the kind that don't need wifi.It's not only the web browser. It's also the bluetooth devices that connected to or were picked up by the Firestick as it broadcasted availability.
I bet that some earlier rumors were true and Bryan had a bluetooth device (Phone, Car, Something) be picked up by a smart device in or near the house.
They are trying to link the two.
The only thing I can think of is the parking ticket he got on that day. Maybe they believe that was Day 1 of his casing of the area. Or that's the day he had some sort of important interaction that they have evidence of.It appears to me that LE/prosecution has requested authority to search all digital devices from the period August 21, 2022 to November 14, 2022. I hope I am misunderstanding this. Are they required to limit their searches by dates? If so, why would they have not at least included the June 2022 period since we suspect he had an appointment to get his hair cut in that area?
"Based on all the foregoing information, there is probable cause to believe that evidence of the above-listed crimes exists in the below described digital devices and that there is probable cause to seize and search those devices for the evidence of the above crimes for the date range August 21, 2022 to 11:59 p.m. on November 14, 2022 including : . . ."
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23577675/full-3.pdf (page 24)
Wasn't August 21st the date mentioned in PCA that he was at King Rd for over an hour (and then stopped by LE shortly after for unrelated reason)? Maybe that is the first time his phone was in that location.It appears to me that LE/prosecution has requested authority to search all digital devices from the period August 21, 2022 to November 14, 2022. I hope I am misunderstanding this. Are they required to limit their searches by dates? If so, why would they have not at least included the June 2022 period since we suspect he had an appointment to get his hair cut in that area?
"Based on all the foregoing information, there is probable cause to believe that evidence of the above-listed crimes exists in the below described digital devices and that there is probable cause to seize and search those devices for the evidence of the above crimes for the date range August 21, 2022 to 11:59 p.m. on November 14, 2022 including : . . ."
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23577675/full-3.pdf (page 24)
I wonder if BK left his apartment as is on purpose because he truly thought local LE was not going to catch up with him because he thought he was so careful and he underestimated their competence? ORData from the Roku Stick will show data from any streaming platforms he might have subscribed to / used on his TV (including YouTube), potentially a Spotify account... there are a ton of apps you can have on that kind of device, and as another user mentioned, it also connects to Bluetooth which could be important. I personally see it as a device that is first and foremost about streaming media (TV, movies, and music), but I think they can do a lot more. Regardless, it might be interesting to see what he was streaming.
Dickies sells a whole range of things - shirts, pants, t shirts, shorts, overalls, coveralls, hats, caps, and even scrubs. JMOQuestion: there’s a lot of speculation about a black Dickies jumpsuit, has that been confirmed?
Could it have been a Dickies face mask or baclava type mask or?
The only thing I noted from from the released docs was a “Dickies” tag?
Did I miss something?
thanks in advance !
Withholding information in the hope BK will accidentally corroborate it or reveal it during a confession is not the main or only reason for withholding information only the offender would know.So where are we disagreeing? I think you're missing the context for my response.
The person I responded to implied that LE is withholding information that only the true killer would be able to give them. A tactic that LE uses to VERIFY someone they suspect was the perp in a crime during a confession or accidental reveal during questioning. I was specifically addressing that.
We are past that point.
I wasn't addressing any other (cited as gamesmanship) means for withholding. Didn't challenge any of those. But if LE is holding on to information at this point hoping Bryan will accidentally corroborate it or reveal it during a confession then that's just silly LOL.
They are confident they have their guy. If they could have drawn a happy face on the PCA and submitted it, they would have.
Well, after all, he is a degreed criminology student, so he’s got some knowledge, despite people calling him stupid, about evidence searches.Agreed. Such a shame that BK had so much time to get rid of evidence in WA. JMO
Agreed. Such a shame that BK had so much time to get rid of evidence in WA. JMO
One could also argue that putting trash in a neighbor’s bin shows that he is sneaky.One could argue him throwing out trash shows that he is tidy.