Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
snipped for focus @maskedwomanI know that attorneys can come in from other areas and ask to be certified to practice in a particular state,...
100% spot on. It's a conflict of interest for every single reason they stated.Chris and Mark both hit the nail on the head in this segment....IMO
I would be furious as Xana's mom. This apparent COI works against the prosecution in every respect. It's going to make it hard for any conviction to stick. It's outrageous.
Ditto!!!!I would be furious as Xana's mom. This apparent COI works against the prosecution is every respect. It's going to make it hard for any conviction to stick. It's outrageous.
Completely.I would be furious as Xana's mom. This apparent COI works against the prosecution is every respect. It's going to make it hard for any conviction to stick. It's outrageous.
Oh wait, Is there a link stating that?Why did Xana’s Mother give Ann Taylor POA?
Why did Xana’s Mother give Ann Taylor POA?
Oh wait, Is there a link stating that?
Are you watching the interview or is this something you read?
I think it's pretty simple as to why we don't know his whereabouts for 12th November.. Your reference to 3.26am on 13th November is from the PCA (attached)The Probable Cause Affadavit. (Just as an aside, the PCA begins explaining BK's movements on November 13th at 2.44am in Pullman, using both phone ping and video/camera surveilenance data gathered and analysed during the course of investigation (please see PCA for all refs)What I found most interesting about the CPA is that the timeline concerning BK's activity begins at 3:26am.
I want to know what BK did on Saturday during the daylight and early evening hours. We know he applied for a position within the PD but we don't know if he was accepted. Is this a possible reason why we know nothing about his whereabouts until 3:26am?
[snipped for focus]
Watching Banfield too.
An attorney brings up a ‘Writ 2255‘ where BK could later appeal and argue that since the lawyer once represented the victim’s mother that the lawyer was conflicted, and provided ineffective counsel.